Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

AMAA vs AMZZ: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, AMAA finished 1.0 points from its stated multiple and AMZZ 0.7.

Corgi AMZN 2x Daily ETF and GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+10.0%AMAA returned, 3 months
+9.4%AMZZ returned, 3 months
−5.5 ptsAMAA from its stated multiple
−5.9 ptsAMZZ from its stated multiple
AMAA1 pt short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
AMZN −3.9% ×2 implies−7.9%AMAA returned−8.9%AMZN −3.9% ×2 implies−7.9%AMAA returned−8.9%
AMZZ5.9 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
AMZN +7.6% ×2 implies+15.3%AMZZ returned+9.4%AMZN +7.6% ×2 implies+15.3%AMZZ returned+9.4%

Performance, window by window

AMAA and AMZZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
AMAAAMZZAMAAAMZZAMAAAMZZ
1 month−8.9%−8.5%−7.9%−7.9%−1.0 pts−0.7 pts
3 monthsnot published+9.4%not published+15.3%not published−5.9 pts
6 monthsnot published+37.9%not published+47.3%not published−9.4 pts
1 yearnot published+4.0%not published+23.3%not published−19.4 pts
Since launch+10.0%+36.6%+15.5%+94.3%−5.5 pts−57.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
AMAA and AMZZ on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AMAA
Corgi AMZN 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Amazon.com (AMZN)
AMZZ
GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Amazon.com (AMZN)
IssuerCorgiGraniteShares
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnAMZNAMZN
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−8.9%+9.4%
Underlying returned, 3 months−3.9%+7.6%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−7.9%+15.3%
Difference from stated, 3 months−1.0 pts−5.9 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+10.0%+4.0%
Difference from stated, over that window−5.5 pts−19.4 pts
Underlying volatility25%44%
Difference over the days both have traded−1.0 pts−0.7 pts
Expense ratio0.45%1.15%
LaunchedJun 30, 2026Mar 18, 2024

AMAA in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: AMAA returned −8.9% where its own daily promise gave −8.2%, 0.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times AMZN's −3.9% implies −7.9%, which makes AMAA look 1.0 points short. 0.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AMAA aims to return +2 times AMZN's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AMZN moved at 25% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

AMZZ in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AMZZ returned +9.4% where its own daily promise gave +11.2%, 1.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times AMZN's 7.6% implies +15.3%, which makes AMZZ look 5.9 points short. 4.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AMZZ aims to return +2 times AMZN's move each day, then resets. AMZN moved at 44% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, AMAA or AMZZ?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, AMAA finished 1.0 points from what its multiple implies and AMZZ finished 5.9 points from its own, so AMAA came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are AMAA and AMZZ levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Amazon.com, AMAA at +2 times and AMZZ at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, AMAA or AMZZ?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window AMAA’s moved at 25% annualized and AMZZ’s at 44%, so AMZZ has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold AMAA or AMZZ for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, AMAA or AMZZ?
AMAA charges 0.45% a year and AMZZ charges 1.15%, so AMAA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AMAA against AMZZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AMAA against AMZZ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/AMAA-AMZZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources