Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

AAPX vs IOSX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, AAPX finished 0.2 points from its stated multiple and IOSX 0.0.

T-REX 2X LONG APPLE DAILY TARGET ETF and Corgi AAPL 2x Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+23.6%AAPX returned, 3 months
+27.4%IOSX returned, 3 months
−4.8 ptsAAPX from its stated multiple
−2.5 ptsIOSX from its stated multiple
AAPX4.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
AAPL +14.2% ×2 implies+28.5%AAPX returned+23.6%AAPL +14.2% ×2 implies+28.5%AAPX returned+23.6%
IOSXOn its stated multiple · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
AAPL +9.9% ×2 implies+19.9%IOSX returned+19.8%AAPL +9.9% ×2 implies+19.9%IOSX returned+19.8%

Performance, window by window

AAPX and IOSX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
AAPXIOSXAAPXIOSXAAPXIOSX
1 month+19.7%+19.8%+19.9%+19.9%−0.2 pts0.0 pts
3 months+23.6%not published+28.5%not published−4.8 ptsnot published
6 months+61.1%not published+66.2%not published−5.1 ptsnot published
1 year+74.7%not published+90.0%not published−15.2 ptsnot published
Since launch+94.9%+27.4%+162.4%+29.9%−67.5 pts−2.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
AAPX and IOSX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AAPX
T-REX 2X LONG APPLE DAILY TARGET ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Apple (AAPL)
IOSX
Corgi AAPL 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Apple (AAPL)
IssuerT-REXCorgi
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnAAPLAAPL
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+23.6%+19.8%
Underlying returned, 3 months+14.2%+9.9%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+28.5%+19.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months−4.8 pts0.0 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+74.7%+27.4%
Difference from stated, over that window−15.2 pts−2.5 pts
Underlying volatility32%23%
Difference over the days both have traded−0.2 pts0.0 pts
Expense ratio1.05%0.45%
LaunchedJan 11, 2024Jun 30, 2026

AAPX in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AAPX returned +23.6% where its own daily promise gave +27.2%, 3.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times AAPL's 14.2% implies +28.5%, which makes AAPX look 4.8 points short. 1.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AAPX aims to return +2 times AAPL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AAPL moved at 32% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

IOSX in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: IOSX returned +19.8% where its own daily promise gave +20.3%, 0.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times AAPL's 9.9% implies +19.9%, which makes IOSX look 0.0 points short. 0.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. IOSX aims to return +2 times AAPL's move each day, then resets. AAPL moved at 23% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, AAPX or IOSX?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, AAPX finished 4.8 points from what its multiple implies and IOSX finished 0.0 points from its own, so IOSX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are AAPX and IOSX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Apple, AAPX at +2 times and IOSX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, AAPX or IOSX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window AAPX’s moved at 32% annualized and IOSX’s at 23%, so AAPX has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold AAPX or IOSX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, AAPX or IOSX?
AAPX charges 1.05% a year and IOSX charges 0.45%, so IOSX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AAPX against IOSX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AAPX against IOSX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/AAPX-IOSX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources