Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

AAOG vs AAOZ: which held to its multiple?

Over a month against its own daily promise, AAOG finished 1.4 points short and AAOZ 0.5 points over.

Leverage Shares 2X Long AAOI Daily ETF and Tradr 2X Short AAOI Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−76.4%AAOG returned, 3 months
−57.4%AAOZ returned, 3 months
−1.0 ptsAAOG from its stated multiple
−64.3 ptsAAOZ from its stated multiple
AAOG1 pt short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
AAOI −37.7% ×2 implies−75.4%AAOG returned−76.4%AAOI −37.7% ×2 implies−75.4%AAOG returned−76.4%
AAOZ19 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
AAOI −23.7% ×2 implies+47.4%AAOZ returned+28.4%AAOI −23.7% ×2 implies+47.4%AAOZ returned+28.4%

Performance, window by window

AAOG and AAOZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
AAOGAAOZAAOGAAOZAAOGAAOZ
1 month−49.3%+28.4%−47.4%+47.4%−1.9 pts−19.0 pts
3 months−76.4%not published−75.4%not published−1.0 ptsnot published
Since launch−84.8%−57.4%−88.1%+6.8%+3.3 pts−64.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
AAOG and AAOZ on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AAOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AAOI Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of AAOI
AAOZ
Tradr 2X Short AAOI Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of AAOI
IssuerLeverage SharesTradr
Sets out to return+2x-2x
OnAAOIAAOI
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−76.4%+28.4%
Underlying returned, 3 months−37.7%−23.7%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−75.4%+47.4%
Difference from stated, 3 months−1.0 pts−19.0 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−84.8%−57.4%
Difference from stated, over that window+3.3 pts−64.3 pts
Underlying volatility131%107%
Difference over the days both have traded−1.0 ptsno shared window
Expense ratio0.75%1.49%
LaunchedMay 12, 2026Jul 15, 2026

AAOG in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AAOG returned −76.4% where its own daily promise gave −74.7%, 1.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times AAOI's −37.7% implies −75.4%, which makes AAOG look 1.0 points short. 0.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AAOG aims to return +2 times AAOI's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AAOI moved at 131% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

AAOZ in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: AAOZ returned +28.4% where its own daily promise gave +27.8%, 0.5 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times AAOI's −23.7% implies +47.4%, which makes AAOZ look 19.0 points short. 19.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AAOZ aims to return -2 times AAOI's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AAOI moved at 107% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, AAOG or AAOZ?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, AAOG finished 1.0 points from what its multiple implies and AAOZ finished 19.0 points from its own, so AAOG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are AAOG and AAOZ levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on AAOI, AAOG at +2 times and AAOZ at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, AAOG or AAOZ?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window AAOG’s moved at 131% annualized and AAOZ’s at 107%, so AAOG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold AAOG or AAOZ for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, AAOG or AAOZ?
AAOG charges 0.75% a year and AAOZ charges 1.49%, so AAOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AAOG against AAOZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AAOG against AAOZ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/AAOG-AAOZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources