Data as of .
TCAL vs YYY: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year YYY paid 12.1% of its price in cash against TCAL’s 11.4% and the two finished level on total return.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: YYY scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, TCAL and YYY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in TCAL | Only in YYY |
|---|---|
| DANAHER CORP 2.01% | abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund 3.61% |
| WATERS CORP 1.97% | BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust 3.33% |
| VERALTO CORP 1.87% | Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Corp 3.32% |
| WASTE CONNECTIONS INC 1.80% | Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund/Closed-end Fund 3.30% |
| YUM BRANDS INC 1.72% | PIMCO High Income Fund 3.04% |
| MCDONALD S CORP 1.70% | Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund 2.98% |
| VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 1.69% | Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund 2.66% |
| LINDE PLC 1.63% | Western Asset Diversified Income Fund 2.45% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCAL | YYY | TCAL | YYY | TCAL | YYY | |
| 3 months | +4.2% | −2.5% | 3.5% | 3.1% | +1.9 pts | −4.8 pts |
| 6 months | +5.3% | +4.7% | 6.3% | 6.5% | −12.7 pts | −13.3 pts |
| 1 year | +3.0% | +3.4% | 11.4% | 12.1% | −13.5 pts | −13.2 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +37.1% | not published | 37.7% | not published | −41.3 pts |
| Since launch | +3.9% | +117.8% | 15.2% | 112.4% | −32.7 pts | −519.1 pts |
| TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | YYY Amplify CEF High Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | T. Rowe Price | Amplify |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.4% | 13.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.34% | 3.23% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.4% | 12.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | −8.6% | −8.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.0% | +3.4% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −13.5 pts | −13.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 540 days | 5211 days |
| Net assets | $276m | $702m |
TCAL in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.4%, paid monthly.
YYY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YYY paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, TCAL or YYY?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its starting price in cash and YYY paid 12.1%, so YYY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, TCAL or YYY?
- With every distribution reinvested, TCAL returned +3.0% and YYY returned +3.4% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so YYY returned more.
- Which is cheaper, TCAL or YYY?
- TCAL charges 0.34% a year and YYY charges 3.23%, so TCAL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, TCAL against YYY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tcal-vs-yyy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.