Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

RNTY vs XQQI: which paid, and which earned it?

RNTY and XQQI both write options for income.

YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Real Estate Option Income ETF and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF.

11.9%RNTY cash paid, 1 year
13.7%XQQI cash paid, 1 year
+4.6%RNTY total return, 1 year
+14.3%XQQI total return, 1 year
RNTY12 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%RNTY+4.6%11.9% as cash12 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%RNTY+4.6%12 pts behind SPY
XQQI2.9 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+17.3%XQQI+14.3%13.7% of it arrived as cash2.9 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+17.3%XQQI+14.3%13.7% as cash2.9 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RNTY and XQQI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in RNTYOnly in XQQI
Prologis Inc 6.72%NVIDIA Corp 8.70%
Welltower Inc 6.63%Apple Inc 7.91%
Vivmark Residential 6.31%Microsoft Corp 5.94%
Digital Realty Trust Inc 5.99%Micron Technology Inc 5.12%
Simon Property Group Inc 5.30%Amazon.com Inc 4.39%
Equinix Inc 4.92%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.08%
St Joe Co/The 4.41%Alphabet Inc 3.28%
Realty Income Corp 4.36%Meta Platforms Inc 3.27%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

RNTY and XQQI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
RNTYXQQIRNTYXQQIRNTYXQQI
3 months−2.3%−2.7%3.0%4.8%−4.5 pts−0.2 pts
6 months+2.5%+21.8%6.2%11.4%−15.6 pts−2.4 pts
1 year+4.6%not published11.9%not published−12.0 ptsnot published
Since launch+7.9%+14.3%15.8%13.7%−39.2 pts−2.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
RNTY and XQQI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RNTY
YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Real Estate Option Income ETF
Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying monthly
XQQI
NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxNEOS
Strategysynthetic covered calloption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyNasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized12.5%20.5%
Expense ratio0.99%0.98%
Cash paid, 1 year11.9%13.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−7.3%−0.3%
Total return, 1 year+4.6%+14.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+17.3%
Ahead or behind−12.0 pts−2.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate0%100%
Age519 days227 days
Net assets$6m$351m

RNTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, RNTY paid 11.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.5%, paid monthly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XQQI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XQQI paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +17.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.5%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, RNTY or XQQI?
RNTY charges 0.99% a year and XQQI charges 0.98%, so XQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RNTY against XQQI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RNTY against XQQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/rnty-vs-xqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources