Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

RECI vs XSPI: which paid, and which earned it?

RECI and XSPI both write options for income.

Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF and NEOS Boosted S&P 500(R) High Income ETF.

0.7%RECI cash paid, 1 year
11.1%XSPI cash paid, 1 year
+2.4%RECI total return, 1 year
+11.6%XSPI total return, 1 year
RECI0.8 pts ahead of SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+1.6%RECI+2.4%0.8 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+1.6%RECI+2.4%0.8 pts ahead of SPY
XSPIAbout even with SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+11.3%XSPI+11.6%11.1% of it arrived as cashabout even with SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+11.3%XSPI+11.6%11.1% as cashabout even with SPY

Performance, window by window

RECI and XSPI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
RECIXSPIRECIXSPIRECIXSPI
3 monthsnot published+3.7%not published4.2%not published+1.4 pts
6 monthsnot published+20.0%not published9.2%not published+1.9 pts
Since launch+2.4%+11.6%0.7%11.1%+0.8 pts+0.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
RECI and XSPI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RECI
Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY
XSPI
NEOS Boosted S&P 500(R) High Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerColumbiaNEOS
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualized8.0%17.1%
Expense ratio0.30%0.98%
Cash paid, 1 year0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)11.1% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Price change, 1 year+1.7%−0.3%
Total return, 1 year+2.4% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)+11.6% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+1.6%+11.3%
Ahead or behind+0.8 pts+0.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published99%
Age66 days227 days
Net assetsnot published$113m

RECI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, RECI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +1.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.0%, paid periodically.

XSPI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XSPI paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +11.3% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.1%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, RECI or XSPI?
RECI charges 0.30% a year and XSPI charges 0.98%, so RECI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RECI against XSPI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RECI against XSPI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/reci-vs-xspi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources