Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QDTY vs TCAL: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTY paid 30.9% of its price in cash against TCAL’s 11.4%, and returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF.

30.9%QDTY cash paid, 1 year
11.4%TCAL cash paid, 1 year
+20.2%QDTY total return, 1 year
+3.0%TCAL total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QDTY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QDTY 37TCAL 21.93.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QDTY1.6 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% of it arrived as cash1.6 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% as cash1.6 pts behind QQQ
TCAL13.5 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%TCAL+3.0%11.4% cash13.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%TCAL+3.0%13.5 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QDTY and TCAL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QDTYOnly in TCAL
NDX 12/18/2026 1001.26 C 96.19%DANAHER CORP 2.01%
XND 12/18/2026 10.02 C 3.21%WATERS CORP 1.97%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.53%VERALTO CORP 1.87%
United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 0.07%WASTE CONNECTIONS INC 1.80%
YUM BRANDS INC 1.72%
MCDONALD S CORP 1.70%
VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 1.69%
LINDE PLC 1.63%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QDTY and TCAL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QDTYTCALQDTYTCALQDTYTCAL
3 months−0.9%+4.2%7.9%3.5%+1.6 pts+1.9 pts
6 months+20.7%+5.3%17.3%6.3%−3.6 pts−12.7 pts
1 year+20.2%+3.0%30.9%11.4%−1.6 pts−13.5 pts
Since launch+27.1%+3.9%42.0%15.2%−8.5 pts−32.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QDTY and TCAL on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QDTY
YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
TCAL
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxT. Rowe Price
Strategy0DTE covered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized25.9%9.4%
Expense ratio1.17%0.34%
Cash paid, 1 year30.9%11.4%
Price change, 1 year−14.0%−8.6%
Total return, 1 year+20.2%+3.0%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−1.6 pts−13.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate94%not published
Age582 days540 days
Net assets$27m$276m

QDTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

TCAL in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.4%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QDTY or TCAL?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting price in cash and TCAL paid 11.4%, so QDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTY or TCAL?
With every distribution reinvested, QDTY returned +20.2% and TCAL returned +3.0% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTY returned more.
Which is cheaper, QDTY or TCAL?
QDTY charges 1.17% a year and TCAL charges 0.34%, so TCAL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QDTY against TCAL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTY against TCAL, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdty-vs-tcal Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources