Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PBP vs TPAY: which paid, and which earned it?

PBP and TPAY both write options for income.

Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF.

11.8%PBP cash paid, 1 year
5.8%TPAY cash paid, 1 year
+18.5%PBP total return, 1 year
+11.0%TPAY total return, 1 year
PBP1.9 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%PBP+18.5%11.8% of it arrived as cash1.9 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%PBP+18.5%11.8% cash1.9 pts ahead of SPY
TPAY0.8 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+11.8%TPAY+11.0%5.8% of it arrived as cash0.8 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+11.8%TPAY+11.0%0.8 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, PBP and TPAY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in PBPOnly in TPAY
NVIDIA Corp 8.18%SPY 03/12/2027 33.67 C 61.75%
Apple Inc 7.50%SPY 04/16/2027 33.18 C 33.20%
Microsoft Corp 5.57%SPYM 03/12/2027 3.33 C 5.05%
Amazon.com Inc 3.77%
Alphabet Inc 3.11%
Broadcom Inc 2.57%
Alphabet Inc 2.47%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.

Performance, window by window

PBP and TPAY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
PBPTPAYPBPTPAYPBPTPAY
3 months+5.0%+1.5%2.8%2.4%+2.7 pts−0.8 pts
6 months+13.0%+17.3%5.7%5.3%−5.0 pts−0.7 pts
1 year+18.5%not published11.8%not published+1.9 ptsnot published
3 years+46.1%not published31.8%not published−32.3 ptsnot published
Since launch+199.0%+11.0%101.2%5.8%−604.5 pts−0.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PBP and TPAY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
TPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerInvescoRoundhill
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized11.3%9.5%
Expense ratio0.29%0.49%
Cash paid, 1 year11.8%5.8% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026)
Price change, 1 year+5.5%+4.9%
Total return, 1 year+18.5%+11.0% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+11.8%
Ahead or behind+1.9 pts−0.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age6101 days212 days
Net assets$386m$2m

PBP in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PBP paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.3%, paid monthly.

TPAY in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 18, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, TPAY paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +11.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.5%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, PBP or TPAY?
PBP charges 0.29% a year and TPAY charges 0.49%, so PBP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PBP against TPAY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PBP against TPAY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pbp-vs-tpay Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources