Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PBP vs QQQY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QQQY paid 30.5% of its price in cash against PBP’s 11.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF.

11.8%PBP cash paid, 1 year
30.5%QQQY cash paid, 1 year
+18.5%PBP total return, 1 year
+21.1%QQQY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: PBP scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

PBP 80.6QQQY 43.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

PBP1.9 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%PBP+18.5%11.8% of it arrived as cash1.9 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%PBP+18.5%11.8% cash1.9 pts ahead of SPY
QQQY0.6 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QQQY+21.1%30.5% of it arrived as cash0.6 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QQQY+21.1%30.5% as cash0.6 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, PBP and QQQY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in PBPOnly in QQQY
NVIDIA Corp 8.18%Ndx 12/18/2026 1000.34 C 98.70%
Apple Inc 7.50%Cash & Other 0.95%
Microsoft Corp 5.57%First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.49%
Amazon.com Inc 3.77%Ndx 09/21/2026 29730.14 C 0.20%
Alphabet Inc 3.11%Ndx 09/21/2026 29644.17 C -0.34%
Broadcom Inc 2.57%
Alphabet Inc 2.47%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 19, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

PBP and QQQY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
PBPQQQYPBPQQQYPBPQQQY
3 months+5.0%−0.5%2.8%8.0%+2.7 pts+2.0 pts
6 months+13.0%+24.3%5.7%17.4%−5.0 pts+0.1 pts
1 year+18.5%+21.1%11.8%30.5%+1.9 pts−0.6 pts
3 years+46.1%+59.1%31.8%88.1%−32.3 pts−39.0 pts
Since launch+199.0%+56.9%101.2%86.8%−604.5 pts−37.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PBP and QQQY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PBP
Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerInvescoDefiance
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized11.3%29.5%
Expense ratio0.29%1.01%
Cash paid, 1 year11.8%30.5%
Price change, 1 year+5.5%−13.2%
Total return, 1 year+18.5%+21.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+21.8%
Ahead or behind+1.9 pts−0.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published69%
Age6101 days1100 days
Net assets$386m$188m

PBP in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PBP paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.3%, paid monthly.

QQQY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQY paid 30.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 13.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.5%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 69% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, PBP or QQQY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PBP paid 11.8% of its starting price in cash and QQQY paid 30.5%, so QQQY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, PBP or QQQY?
With every distribution reinvested, PBP returned +18.5% and QQQY returned +21.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QQQY returned more.
Which is cheaper, PBP or QQQY?
PBP charges 0.29% a year and QQQY charges 1.01%, so PBP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PBP against QQQY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PBP against QQQY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pbp-vs-qqqy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources