Data as of .
NFLP vs NFLW: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year NFLW paid 23.5% of its price in cash against NFLP’s 12.4%, though NFLP returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: NFLP scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 64 income ETFs writing on a single company. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, NFLP and NFLW hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | NFLP | NFLW |
|---|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL | 36.64% | 93.64% |
| Only in NFLP | Only in NFLW |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 34.98% | Netflix Inc 6.37% |
| TREASURY BILL 28.38% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFLP | NFLW | NFLP | NFLW | NFLP | NFLW | |
| 3 months | −10.1% | −9.6% | 4.1% | 8.9% | −2.9 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 6 months | −27.6% | −26.7% | 6.7% | 14.7% | −5.8 pts | −4.9 pts |
| 1 year | −45.6% | −48.5% | 12.4% | 23.5% | −5.1 pts | −7.9 pts |
| Since launch | +18.0% | −49.9% | 69.6% | 32.4% | −62.4 pts | −8.6 pts |
| NFLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Netflix (NFLX) ETF Synthetic covered call on NFLX, paying monthly | NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF Option income on NFLX, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Kurv | Roundhill |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Netflix (NFLX) | Netflix (NFLX) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 17.7% | 30.4% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 1.00% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 12.4% | 23.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | −54.5% | −65.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | −45.6% | −48.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −40.6% | −40.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −5.1 pts | −7.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 84% | not published |
| Age | 1057 days | 457 days |
| Net assets | $5m | $8m |
NFLP in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, NFLP paid 12.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 54.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −45.6%. Netflix (NFLX) returned −40.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.7%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 84% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
NFLW in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, NFLW paid 23.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 65.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −48.5%. Netflix (NFLX) returned −40.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.4%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, NFLP or NFLW?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, NFLP paid 12.4% of its starting price in cash and NFLW paid 23.5%, so NFLW paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, NFLP or NFLW?
- With every distribution reinvested, NFLP returned −45.6% and NFLW returned −48.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so NFLP returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, NFLP against NFLW, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/nflp-vs-nflw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.