Data as of .
JUDO vs QUSA: which paid, and which earned it?
JUDO and QUSA both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JUDO and QUSA hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | JUDO | QUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Corp. | 6.00% | 6.08% |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 8.32% | 5.78% |
| Apple, Inc. | 4.88% | 5.99% |
| Broadcom, Inc. | 3.92% | 4.70% |
| Eli Lilly & Co. | 2.30% | 4.24% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 7.49% | 1.84% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. | 1.75% | 4.28% |
| Mastercard, Inc. | 1.64% | 2.51% |
| Visa, Inc. | 1.62% | 3.37% |
| General Electric Co. | 1.54% | 2.75% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 1.41% | 2.93% |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 1.29% | 2.61% |
| Only in JUDO | Only in QUSA |
|---|---|
| Amazon.com, Inc. 5.20% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 5.35% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.30% | Caterpillar Inc 4.91% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. 1.90% | Costco Wholesale Corp 4.40% |
| Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) 1.51% | Walmart Inc 4.17% |
| Chevron Corp. 1.50% | Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.85% |
| AbbVie, Inc. 1.38% | Blackrock Inc 2.99% |
| Home Depot, Inc. (The) 1.34% | KLA CORP 2.69% |
| American Express Co. 1.32% | Adobe Inc 2.32% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JUDO | QUSA | JUDO | QUSA | JUDO | QUSA | |
| 3 months | +1.8% | −1.9% | 1.5% | 3.6% | −0.5 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +10.4% | not published | 7.8% | not published | −4.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +3.5% | not published | 13.8% | not published | −11.7 pts |
| Since launch | +14.7% | +4.9% | 2.6% | 15.1% | −1.8 pts | −25.8 pts |
| JUDO Janus Henderson U.S. Equity Enhanced Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | QUSA VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Janus Henderson | VistaShares |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.4% | 15.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.97% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 2.6% (since launch on Mar 25, 2026) | 13.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | +12.1% | −11.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.7% (since launch on Mar 25, 2026) | +3.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +15.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −1.8 pts | −11.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 177 days | 500 days |
| Net assets | $7m | $22m |
JUDO in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 25, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, JUDO paid 2.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.4%, paid monthly.
QUSA in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, JUDO or QUSA?
- JUDO charges 0.55% a year and QUSA charges 0.97%, so JUDO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, JUDO against QUSA, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/judo-vs-qusa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.