Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

IVVW vs RDVI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year IVVW paid 17.5% of its price in cash against RDVI’s 8.8%, though RDVI returned more with it reinvested.

iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF and FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF.

17.5%IVVW cash paid, 1 year
8.8%RDVI cash paid, 1 year
+17.2%IVVW total return, 1 year
+19.2%RDVI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: RDVI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

IVVW 61.3RDVI 62.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

IVVW0.6 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%IVVW+17.2%17.5% of it arrived as cash0.6 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%IVVW+17.2%17.5% cash0.6 pts ahead of SPY
RDVI8 pts behind SCHD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+27.2%RDVI+19.2%8.8% of it arrived as cash8 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+27.2%RDVI+19.2%8 pts behind SCHD

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVVW and RDVI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in IVVWOnly in RDVI
ISHARES CORE S&P ETF TRUST 101.45%Lam Research Corporation 2.31%
USD CASH 0.18%Applied Materials, Inc. 2.30%
OCT26 SPX C @ 7625.000000 -1.63%The Travelers Companies, Inc. 2.27%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 2.22%
GE Vernova Inc. 2.19%
Micron Technology, Inc. 2.18%
KLA Corporation 2.16%
NVIDIA Corporation 2.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

IVVW and RDVI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
IVVWRDVIIVVWRDVIIVVWRDVI
3 months+4.6%+0.3%2.6%2.1%+2.4 pts−6.3 pts
6 months+13.1%+15.1%7.9%4.6%−4.9 pts+2.5 pts
1 year+17.2%+19.2%17.5%8.8%+0.6 pts−8.0 pts
3 yearsnot published+69.2%not published29.6%not published+15.5 pts
Since launch+38.9%+101.2%39.7%41.0%−14.9 pts+32.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
IVVW and RDVI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
RDVI
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly
IssueriSharesFirst Trust
Strategycovered calldividend stocks with call overlay
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized7.6%8.8%
Expense ratio0.25%0.75%
Cash paid, 1 year17.5%8.8%
Price change, 1 year−2.0%+9.6%
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+19.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+27.2%
Ahead or behind+0.6 pts−8.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age917 days1429 days
Net assets$350m$3.7bn

IVVW in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IVVW paid 17.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.6%, paid monthly.

RDVI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, RDVI paid 8.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, IVVW or RDVI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IVVW paid 17.5% of its starting price in cash and RDVI paid 8.8%, so IVVW paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, IVVW or RDVI?
With every distribution reinvested, IVVW returned +17.2% and RDVI returned +19.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so RDVI returned more.
Which is cheaper, IVVW or RDVI?
IVVW charges 0.25% a year and RDVI charges 0.75%, so IVVW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IVVW against RDVI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVVW against RDVI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ivvw-vs-rdvi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources