Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

IVVW vs KNG: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year IVVW paid 17.5% of its price in cash against KNG’s 8.5%, and returned more with it reinvested.

iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF.

17.5%IVVW cash paid, 1 year
8.5%KNG cash paid, 1 year
+17.2%IVVW total return, 1 year
+8.3%KNG total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: IVVW scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

IVVW 61.3KNG 53.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

IVVW0.6 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%IVVW+17.2%17.5% of it arrived as cash0.6 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%IVVW+17.2%17.5% as cash0.6 pts ahead of SPY
KNG1.6 pts behind NOBL · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
NOBL+9.9%KNG+8.3%8.5% of it arrived as cash1.6 pts behind NOBLTotal return, distributions reinvestedNOBL+9.9%KNG+8.3%1.6 pts behind NOBL

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVVW and KNG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in IVVWOnly in KNG
ISHARES CORE S&P ETF TRUST 100.84%Johnson & Johnson 1.85%
USD CASH 0.66%Nucor Corporation 1.85%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.14%West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.77%
OCT26 SPX C @ 7625.000000 -1.64%Chubb Limited 1.74%
Becton, Dickinson and Company 1.72%
The Procter & Gamble Company 1.72%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company 1.71%
Walmart Inc. 1.71%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 17, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

IVVW and KNG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
IVVWKNGIVVWKNGIVVWKNG
3 months+4.6%+1.8%2.6%2.2%+2.4 pts−0.1 pts
6 months+13.1%+7.1%7.9%4.4%−4.9 pts−0.9 pts
1 year+17.2%+8.3%17.5%8.5%+0.6 pts−1.6 pts
3 yearsnot published+24.0%not published25.4%not published−4.3 pts
Since launch+38.9%+101.5%39.7%59.4%−14.9 pts−15.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
IVVW and KNG on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
KNG
FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on NOBL, paying monthly
IssueriSharesFirst Trust
Strategycovered calldividend stocks with call overlay
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized7.6%8.8%
Expense ratio0.25%0.74%
Cash paid, 1 year17.5%8.5%
Price change, 1 year−2.0%−0.4%
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+8.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+9.9%
Ahead or behind+0.6 pts−1.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age917 days3097 days
Net assets$350m$3.3bn

IVVW in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IVVW paid 17.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.6%, paid monthly.

KNG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KNG paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.3%. S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (NOBL) returned +9.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, IVVW or KNG?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IVVW paid 17.5% of its starting price in cash and KNG paid 8.5%, so IVVW paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, IVVW or KNG?
With every distribution reinvested, IVVW returned +17.2% and KNG returned +8.3% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so IVVW returned more.
Which is cheaper, IVVW or KNG?
IVVW charges 0.25% a year and KNG charges 0.74%, so IVVW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IVVW against KNG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IVVW against KNG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ivvw-vs-kng Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources