Data as of .
HEMI vs TPAY: which paid, and which earned it?
HEMI and TPAY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, HEMI and TPAY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in HEMI | Only in TPAY |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 9.11% | SPY 03/12/2027 33.67 C 61.75% |
| Alphabet Inc 7.69% | SPY 04/16/2027 33.18 C 33.20% |
| Apple Inc 5.86% | SPYM 03/12/2027 3.33 C 5.05% |
| Amazon.com Inc 5.73% | |
| Microsoft Corp 5.72% | |
| Broadcom Inc 4.02% | |
| Meta Platforms Inc 2.66% | |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.42% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEMI | TPAY | HEMI | TPAY | HEMI | TPAY | |
| 3 months | +0.8% | +1.5% | 2.2% | 2.4% | −1.5 pts | −0.8 pts |
| 6 months | +13.6% | +17.3% | 4.9% | 5.3% | −4.5 pts | −0.7 pts |
| Since launch | +11.2% | +11.0% | 6.0% | 5.8% | −3.4 pts | −0.8 pts |
| HEMI Hartford Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | TPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Hartford | Roundhill |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.1% | 9.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.49% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.0% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025) | 5.8% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | +4.9% | +4.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.2% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025) | +11.0% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +14.7% | +11.8% |
| Ahead or behind | −3.4 pts | −0.8 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 275 days | 212 days |
| Net assets | $33m | $2m |
HEMI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Dec 17, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, HEMI paid 6.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.
TPAY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 18, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, TPAY paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +11.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.5%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, HEMI or TPAY?
- HEMI charges 0.49% a year and TPAY charges 0.49%, so HEMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HEMI against TPAY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/hemi-vs-tpay Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.