Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FEPI vs ULTY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year ULTY paid 46.9% of its price in cash against FEPI’s 23.4%, though FEPI returned more with it reinvested.

REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF and YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

23.4%FEPI cash paid, 1 year
46.9%ULTY cash paid, 1 year
+17.1%FEPI total return, 1 year
−5.8%ULTY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: FEPI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

FEPI 37.9ULTY 4.73.2, the lowest in this set96.9, the highest

A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FEPI5.8 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%FEPI+17.1%23.4% of it arrived as cash5.8 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%FEPI+17.1%23.4% cash5.8 pts behind QQQ
ULTY23.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
SPY+17.5%ULTY−5.8%23.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+17.5%ULTY−5.8%23.3 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and ULTY hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FEPI and ULTY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFEPIULTY
ALPHABET INC.8.83%5.66%
AMAZON.COM, INC.5.21%5.16%
NVIDIA CORPORATION7.76%4.80%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.5.17%4.40%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.9.98%4.15%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FEPIOnly in ULTY
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 8.91%Analog Devices Inc 5.47%
BROADCOM INC. 8.05%Lam Research Corp 4.99%
TESLA, INC. 7.47%Ciena Corp 4.95%
INTEL CORPORATION 5.24%Quanta Services Inc 4.95%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.19%Lumentum Holdings Inc 4.86%
APPLOVIN CORPORATION 5.16%IREN Ltd 4.80%
NETFLIX, INC. 5.16%Strategy Inc 4.65%
ORACLE CORPORATION 5.16%Astera Labs Inc 4.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FEPI and ULTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FEPIULTYFEPIULTYFEPIULTY
3 months+4.2%−0.3%6.1%14.2%+5.0 pts−3.6 pts
6 months+14.6%+11.2%12.1%29.8%−6.1 pts−4.8 pts
1 year+17.1%−5.8%23.4%46.9%−5.8 pts−23.3 pts
Since launch+67.5%+9.0%66.4%86.7%−28.2 pts−45.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FEPI and ULTY on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FEPI
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
ULTY
YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerREXYieldMax
Strategycovered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxyS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized25.2%61.5%
Expense ratio0.65%1.30%
Cash paid, 1 year23.4%46.9%
Price change, 1 year−8.5%−53.3%
Total return, 1 year+17.1%−5.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.0%+17.5%
Ahead or behind−5.8 pts−23.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age1066 days925 days

FEPI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.8 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.2%, paid weekly.

ULTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, ULTY paid 46.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 53.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −5.8%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 23.3 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 61.5%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FEPI or ULTY?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting price in cash and ULTY paid 46.9%, so ULTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or ULTY?
With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +17.1% and ULTY returned −5.8% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so FEPI returned more.
Which is cheaper, FEPI or ULTY?
FEPI charges 0.65% a year and ULTY charges 1.30%, so FEPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FEPI against ULTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FEPI against ULTY, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fepi-vs-ulty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources