Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DYLG vs OCTJ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year DYLG paid 9.5% of its price in cash against OCTJ’s 5.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October.

9.5%DYLG cash paid, 1 year
5.2%OCTJ cash paid, 1 year
+13.8%DYLG total return, 1 year
+5.5%OCTJ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DYLG scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

DYLG 72.3OCTJ 42.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DYLGAbout even with DIA · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
DIA+13.5%DYLG+13.8%9.5% of it arrived as cashabout even with DIATotal return, distributions reinvestedDIA+13.5%DYLG+13.8%9.5% cashabout even with DIA
OCTJ11.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%OCTJ+5.5%5.2% of it arrived as cash11.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%OCTJ+5.5%11.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYLG and OCTJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in DYLGOnly in OCTJ
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 10.88%TREASURY BILL 98.69%
CATERPILLAR INC 9.35%TREASURY BILL 1.31%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.70%
AMGEN INC 4.46%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 4.35%
TRAVELERS COS INC/THE 4.33%
VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 4.25%
ALPHABET INC-CL A 4.04%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

DYLG and OCTJ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
DYLGOCTJDYLGOCTJDYLGOCTJ
3 months+1.9%+1.1%0.8%1.3%+1.5 pts−1.1 pts
6 months+13.0%+4.0%2.1%2.7%−0.9 pts−14.1 pts
1 year+13.8%+5.5%9.5%5.2%+0.3 pts−11.1 pts
3 years+47.0%not published30.8%not published−9.8 ptsnot published
Since launch+44.7%+18.9%30.7%15.9%−8.3 pts−66.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DYLG and OCTJ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYLG
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Covered call on DIA, paying monthly
OCTJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - October
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
IssuerGlobal XInnovator
Strategycovered calldefined income
BenchmarkDow Jones Industrial Average (DIA)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyquarterly
Payout rate, annualized3.1%5.3%
Expense ratio0.35%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year9.5%5.2%
Price change, 1 year+3.5%+0.1%
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+5.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+13.5%+16.6%
Ahead or behind+0.3 pts−11.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate59%not published
Age1150 days1082 days
Net assets$6m$15m

DYLG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.8%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 3.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 59% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

OCTJ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OCTJ paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DYLG or OCTJ?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting price in cash and OCTJ paid 5.2%, so DYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DYLG or OCTJ?
With every distribution reinvested, DYLG returned +13.8% and OCTJ returned +5.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DYLG returned more.
Which is cheaper, DYLG or OCTJ?
DYLG charges 0.35% a year and OCTJ charges 0.79%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYLG against OCTJ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYLG against OCTJ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dylg-vs-octj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources