Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DUBS vs QLDY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QLDY paid 29.2% of its price in cash against DUBS’s 2.3%, though DUBS returned more with it reinvested.

Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF and Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread(TM) Income ETF.

2.3%DUBS cash paid, 1 year
29.2%QLDY cash paid, 1 year
+20.3%DUBS total return, 1 year
+10.6%QLDY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DUBS scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

DUBS 94QLDY 19.13.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DUBS3.7 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%DUBS+20.3%3.7 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%DUBS+20.3%3.7 pts ahead of SPY
QLDY11.2 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QLDY+10.6%29.2% of it arrived as cash11.2 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QLDY+10.6%11.2 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DUBS and QLDY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in DUBSOnly in QLDY
State Street SPDR Portfolio S& 74.61%Ndx 12/18/2026 2001.44 C 94.80%
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core E 25.28%First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 4.77%
TREASURY BILL 0.11%United States Treasury Note/bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 0.53%
Ndxp Us 09/21/26 P29500 0.08%
Xnd 12/18/2026 10.44 C 0.05%
Cash & Other -0.06%
Nasdaq-1 Put Opt 09/26 29650 -0.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

DUBS and QLDY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
DUBSQLDYDUBSQLDYDUBSQLDY
3 months+3.2%−6.6%0.5%8.3%+1.0 pts−4.1 pts
6 months+20.3%+20.1%1.2%18.7%+2.3 pts−4.2 pts
1 year+20.3%+10.6%2.3%29.2%+3.7 pts−11.2 pts
3 years+80.1%not published9.1%not published+1.7 ptsnot published
Since launch+84.4%+10.6%9.3%29.2%+2.4 pts−11.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DUBS and QLDY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DUBS
Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF
Option income on SPY, paying quarterly
QLDY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread(TM) Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerAptusDefiance
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysquarterlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized2.1%19.6%
Expense ratio0.40%1.04%
Cash paid, 1 year2.3%29.2%
Price change, 1 year+17.6%−20.3%
Total return, 1 year+20.3%+10.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+21.8%
Ahead or behind+3.7 pts−11.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age1192 days365 days
Net assets$353m$52m

DUBS in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 17.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 2.1%, paid quarterly.

QLDY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QLDY paid 29.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 20.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.6%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DUBS or QLDY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting price in cash and QLDY paid 29.2%, so QLDY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DUBS or QLDY?
With every distribution reinvested, DUBS returned +20.3% and QLDY returned +10.6% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DUBS returned more.
Which is cheaper, DUBS or QLDY?
DUBS charges 0.40% a year and QLDY charges 1.04%, so DUBS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DUBS against QLDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DUBS against QLDY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-qldy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources