Data as of .
DOGG vs OVL: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year DOGG paid 9.6% of its price in cash against OVL’s 8.9%, though OVL returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DOGG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DOGG and OVL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in DOGG | Only in OVL |
|---|---|
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 69.94% | Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 100.00% |
| Merck & Co., Inc. 7.18% | |
| The Procter & Gamble Company 6.47% | |
| Amgen Inc. 6.33% | |
| Chevron Corporation 5.81% | |
| Verizon Communications Inc. 5.55% | |
| The Coca-Cola Company 5.47% | |
| McDonald's Corporation 4.92% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOGG | OVL | DOGG | OVL | DOGG | OVL | |
| 3 months | +2.5% | +2.3% | 2.3% | 2.6% | +2.1 pts | 0.0 pts |
| 6 months | +3.9% | +18.8% | 4.5% | 5.7% | −10.1 pts | +0.7 pts |
| 1 year | +18.1% | +19.2% | 9.6% | 8.9% | +4.6 pts | +2.6 pts |
| 3 years | +40.2% | +86.2% | 28.0% | 21.1% | −16.7 pts | +7.8 pts |
| Since launch | +43.7% | +203.4% | 30.9% | 47.2% | −17.9 pts | +16.1 pts |
| DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF Option income on DIA, paying monthly | OVL Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF Put-selling overlay on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Overlay Shares |
| Strategy | option income | put-selling overlay |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.1% | 10.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | not published |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.6% | 8.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | +8.0% | +9.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.1% | +19.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.6 pts | +2.6 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1240 days | 2544 days |
| Net assets | $87m | $276m |
DOGG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DOGG paid 9.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.1%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.
OVL in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OVL paid 8.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.4%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DOGG or OVL?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DOGG paid 9.6% of its starting price in cash and OVL paid 8.9%, so DOGG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DOGG or OVL?
- With every distribution reinvested, DOGG returned +18.1% and OVL returned +19.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OVL returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DOGG against OVL, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dogg-vs-ovl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.