Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DIPS vs NVDW: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year NVDW paid 41.7% of its price in cash against DIPS’s 35.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF and Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF.

35.2%DIPS cash paid, 1 year
41.7%NVDW cash paid, 1 year
−16.6%DIPS total return, 1 year
+25.1%NVDW total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: NVDW scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

DIPS 25NVDW 68.87.8, the lowest in this set97.7, the highest

A percentile among the 64 income ETFs writing on a single company. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DIPS43.1 pts behind NVDA · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
NVDA+26.4%DIPS−16.6%43.1 pts behind NVDATotal return, distributions reinvestedNVDA+26.4%DIPS−16.6%43.1 pts behind NVDA
NVDW1.4 pts behind NVDA · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
NVDA+26.4%NVDW+25.1%41.7% of it arrived as cash1.4 pts behind NVDATotal return, distributions reinvestedNVDA+26.4%NVDW+25.1%41.7% cash1.4 pts behind NVDA

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DIPS and NVDW hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DIPS and NVDW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDIPSNVDW
TREASURY BILL40.06%80.60%
Only in each
Only in DIPSOnly in NVDW
TREASURY BILL 22.09%NVIDIA Corp 19.40%
TREASURY BILL 13.83%
TREASURY BILL 12.09%
TREASURY BILL 11.93%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

DIPS and NVDW over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
DIPSNVDWDIPSNVDWDIPSNVDW
3 months−7.9%+5.4%9.3%9.9%−13.5 pts−0.3 pts
6 months−21.1%+31.5%16.4%23.3%−50.1 pts+2.5 pts
1 year−16.6%+25.1%35.2%41.7%−43.1 pts−1.4 pts
Since launch−55.1%+65.9%45.4%66.0%−150.1 pts+3.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DIPS and NVDW on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DIPS
YieldMax(R) Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
Short single-stock option income on NVDA, paying weekly
NVDW
Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF
Option income on NVDA, paying weekly
IssuerYieldMaxRoundhill
Strategyshort single-stock option incomeoption income
BenchmarkNVIDIA (NVDA)NVIDIA (NVDA)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized40.7%54.1%
Expense ratio1.05%1.00%
Cash paid, 1 year35.2%41.7%
Price change, 1 year−47.3%−22.8%
Total return, 1 year−16.6%+25.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+26.4%+26.4%
Ahead or behind−43.1 pts−1.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate95%not published
Age786 days473 days
Net assets$12m$117m

DIPS in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DIPS paid 35.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 47.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −16.6%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +26.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 43.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 40.7%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

NVDW in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, NVDW paid 41.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 22.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +25.1%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +26.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 54.1%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DIPS or NVDW?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DIPS paid 35.2% of its starting price in cash and NVDW paid 41.7%, so NVDW paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DIPS or NVDW?
With every distribution reinvested, DIPS returned −16.6% and NVDW returned +25.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so NVDW returned more.
Which is cheaper, DIPS or NVDW?
DIPS charges 1.05% a year and NVDW charges 1.00%, so NVDW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DIPS against NVDW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIPS against NVDW, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dips-vs-nvdw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources