Which paid more, CSHI or TLTP?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CSHI paid 4.8% of its starting price in cash and TLTP paid 11.9%, so TLTP paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, CSHI or TLTP?

With every distribution reinvested, CSHI returned +4.8% and TLTP −2.2% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, CSHI or TLTP?

CSHI charges 0.38% a year and TLTP charges 0.39%, so CSHI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

CSHI vs TLTP: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, TLTP paid 11.9% of its price in cash against CSHI’s 4.8%, though CSHI returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CSHI and TLTP

Net assets: $2.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF, and $31m on Nov 3, 2026 for Amplify TLT U.S. Treasury 12% Option Income ETF.

CSHI on its own →TLTP on its own →

At a glance

4.8%

CSHI cash paid, 1 year

11.9%

TLTP cash paid, 1 year

+4.8%

CSHI total return, 1 year

−2.2%

TLTP total return, 1 year

CSHI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.1 pts ahead of BIL

CSHI

+4.8%

BIL

+3.7%

1.1 pts ahead of BIL

CSHI over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.1%, total +4.8%, BIL +3.7%, +1.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

BIL

+3.7%

CSHI

+4.8%

4.8% of it arrived as cash

1.1 pts ahead of BIL

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.1 pts ahead of BIL

CSHI over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.1%, total +4.8%, BIL +3.7%, +1.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

BIL

+3.7%

CSHI

+4.8%

4.8% cash

1.1 pts ahead of BIL

4.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. CSHI over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.1%, total +4.8%, BIL +3.7%, +1.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

TLTP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 2.6 pts ahead of TLT

TLTP

−2.2%

TLT

−4.8%

2.6 pts ahead of TLT

TLTP over 1 year: paid 11.9%, price −14.0%, total −2.2%, TLT −4.8%, +2.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

TLT

−4.8%

TLTP

−2.2%

2.6 pts ahead of TLT

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.6 pts ahead of TLT

TLTP over 1 year: paid 11.9%, price −14.0%, total −2.2%, TLT −4.8%, +2.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

TLT

−4.8%

TLTP

−2.2%

2.6 pts ahead of TLT

11.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. TLTP over 1 year: paid 11.9%, price −14.0%, total −2.2%, TLT −4.8%, +2.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

CSHI costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.0 points; CSHI is far larger, $2.1bn against $31m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CSHI vs TLTP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	CSHI	TLTP
Paid and earned
Measure	CSHI	TLTP
Total return, 1 year	+4.8%	−2.2%
Price change, 1 year	fell 0.1%	fell 14.0%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	24% of the Oct 16, 2026 payment	68% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	CSHI	TLTP
Benchmark	1-3 month T-bills, measured through BIL	20+ Year Treasury, measured through TLT
Cost and size
Measure	CSHI	TLTP
Expense ratio	0.38%	0.39%
Net assets, as of Oct 28, 2026	$2.1bn	$31m
Holdings
Measure	CSHI	TLTP
Holdings in common	0%

ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · CSHI scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?

IQ Income Score56.6CSHI14.1TLTP

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

CSHI 56.6

TLTP 14.1

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, CSHI and TLTP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CSHI TLTP

Only in one fund ↓

Only in CSHI

SPXW US 11/12/26 P7025 0.02%

SPXW US 11/12/26 P6625 0.01%

SPXW US 11/12/26 P6700 0.01%

SPXW US 11/12/26 P6775 0.01%

SPXW US 11/12/26 P6925 -0.02%

SPXW US 11/12/26 P7075 -0.03%

SPXW US 11/12/26 P7150 -0.04%

SPXW US 11/12/26 P7225 -0.05%

Only in TLTP

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF 55.03%

United States Treasury Note/Bond 5.125% 08/15/2056 44.38%

TLT 11/06/2026 82 C -0.16%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CSHI NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF · Sells put spreads on the S&P 500, investing in 1-3 month T-bills (BIL), paying monthly TLTP Amplify TLT U.S. Treasury 12% Option Income ETF · Option income on TLT, paying monthly

Issuer NEOS Amplify

Strategy put-selling overlay option income

Benchmark 1-3 month T-bills (BIL) 20+ Year Treasury (TLT)

Pays monthly monthly

Payout rate, annualized 5.0% 13.0%

Expense ratio 0.38% 0.39%

Cash paid, 1 year 4.8% 11.9%

Price change, 1 year −0.1% −14.0%

Total return, 1 year +4.8% −2.2%

Benchmark return, 1 year +3.7% −4.8%

Ahead or behind +1.1 pts +2.6 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 24% 68%

Age 4.2 years 2.0 years

Net assets, CSHI as of Oct 28, 2026 and TLTP as of Nov 3, 2026 $2.1bn $31m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: CSHI vs TLTP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	CSHI	TLTP	CSHI	TLTP	CSHI	TLTP
3 months	+1.0%	+0.4%	1.2%	3.2%	+0.1 pts	+0.7 pts
6 months	+2.1%	−1.8%	2.4%	6.3%	+0.3 pts	+0.9 pts
1 year	+4.8%	−2.2%	4.8%	11.9%	+1.2 pts	+2.6 pts
3 years	+16.6%	–	15.8%	–	+2.7 pts	–
Since launchNot the same days: CSHI Aug 2022 · TLTP Oct 2024	+24.5%	0.0%	22.4%	22.0%	+4.7 pts	+2.5 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

CSHI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CSHI paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.8%. 1-3 month T-bills (BIL) returned +3.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 24% of the distribution paid Oct 16, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

TLTP

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, TLTP paid 11.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.2%. 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) returned −4.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.6 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.0%, paid monthly. Amplify estimates that 68% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, CSHI or TLTP?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CSHI paid 4.8% of its starting price in cash and TLTP paid 11.9%, so TLTP paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, CSHI or TLTP?: With every distribution reinvested, CSHI returned +4.8% and TLTP −2.2% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, CSHI or TLTP?: CSHI charges 0.38% a year and TLTP charges 0.39%, so CSHI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CSHI vs TLTI CSHI vs LTTI CSHI vs TSYW CSHI vs FIYY TLTP vs TLTW TLTP vs TLTX TLTP vs TSYW TLTP vs FIYY

Where to next

1-3 month T-bills (BIL) →20+ Year Treasury (TLT) →CSHI on its own →TLTP on its own →CSHI dividend history →CSHI holdings →TLTP dividend history →TLTP holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

CSHI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

CSHI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

CSHI 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

NEOS page for CSHI ↗

TLTP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

TLTP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

TLTP 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Amplify page for TLTP ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CSHI against TLTP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cshi-vs-tltp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.