Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CONY vs GPIQ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year CONY paid 40.0% of its price in cash against GPIQ’s 11.1%, though GPIQ returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) COIN Option Income Strategy ETF and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

40.0%CONY cash paid, 1 year
11.1%GPIQ cash paid, 1 year
−41.0%CONY total return, 1 year
+21.9%GPIQ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: GPIQ scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

CONY 49.2GPIQ 78.59.1, the lowest in this set97.6, the highest

A percentile among the 61 income ETFs writing on a single company. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CONY4.9 pts ahead of COIN · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
COIN−45.9%CONY−41.0%4.9 pts ahead of COINTotal return, distributions reinvestedCOIN−45.9%CONY−41.0%4.9 pts ahead of COIN
GPIQ1.1 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%GPIQ+21.9%11.1% as cash1.1 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%GPIQ+21.9%1.1 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CONY and GPIQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CONYOnly in GPIQ
TREASURY BILL 37.96%NVIDIA CORP 7.48%
TREASURY BILL 25.76%APPLE INC 6.59%
TREASURY BILL 25.29%MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.62%
TREASURY BILL 7.55%AMAZON.COM INC 4.20%
TREASURY BILL 3.44%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 4.11%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.96%
ALPHABET INC 3.54%
TESLA INC 3.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

CONY and GPIQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
CONYGPIQCONYGPIQCONYGPIQ
3 months+10.8%−0.4%16.9%2.6%+1.2 pts+0.4 pts
6 months−4.2%+17.3%30.2%5.8%+6.2 pts−3.4 pts
1 year−41.0%+21.9%40.0%11.1%+4.9 pts−1.1 pts
3 years+30.7%not published162.8%not published−84.8 ptsnot published
Since launch+37.6%+96.4%171.5%38.2%−83.7 pts−15.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CONY and GPIQ on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CONY
YieldMax(R) COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on COIN, paying weekly
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxGoldman Sachs
Strategysynthetic covered callcovered call
BenchmarkCoinbase (COIN)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized91.0%10.6%
Expense ratio1.04%0.29%
Cash paid, 1 year40.0%11.1%
Price change, 1 year−72.9%+9.8%
Total return, 1 year−41.0%+21.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year−45.9%+23.0%
Ahead or behind+4.9 pts−1.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate59%not published
Age1123 days1051 days

CONY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, CONY paid 40.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 72.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −41.0%. Coinbase (COIN) returned −45.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 91.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 59% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

GPIQ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.6%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, CONY or GPIQ?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, CONY paid 40.0% of its starting price in cash and GPIQ paid 11.1%, so CONY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, CONY or GPIQ?
With every distribution reinvested, CONY returned −41.0% and GPIQ returned +21.9% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so GPIQ returned more.
Which is cheaper, CONY or GPIQ?
CONY charges 1.04% a year and GPIQ charges 0.29%, so GPIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CONY against GPIQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CONY against GPIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cony-vs-gpiq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources