Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CDPI vs RECI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the window both share CDPI paid 0.7% of its price in cash against RECI’s 0.7%, though RECI returned more with it reinvested.

Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF and Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF.

0.7%CDPI cash paid, 1 year
0.7%RECI cash paid, 1 year
+0.5%CDPI total return, 1 year
+2.4%RECI total return, 1 year
CDPI4.1 pts behind SCHD · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+4.6%CDPI+0.5%4.1 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+4.6%CDPI+0.5%4.1 pts behind SCHD
RECI0.8 pts ahead of SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+1.6%RECI+2.4%0.7% cash0.8 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+1.6%RECI+2.4%0.8 pts ahead of SPY

Performance, window by window

CDPI and RECI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
CDPIRECICDPIRECICDPIRECI
Since launch+0.5%+2.4%0.7%0.7%−4.1 pts+0.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CDPI and RECI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CDPI
Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SCHD
RECI
Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY
IssuerColumbiaColumbia
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkUS dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysnot establishednot established
Payout rate, annualized8.2%8.0%
Expense ratio0.45%0.30%
Cash paid, 1 year0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−0.2%+1.7%
Total return, 1 year+0.5% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)+2.4% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+4.6%+1.6%
Ahead or behind−4.1 pts+0.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age66 days66 days
Net assetsnot publishednot published

CDPI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, CDPI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.2%, paid periodically.

RECI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, RECI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +1.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.0%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, CDPI or RECI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CDPI paid 0.7% of its starting price in cash and RECI paid 0.7%, so CDPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, CDPI or RECI?
With every distribution reinvested, CDPI returned +0.5% and RECI returned +2.4% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so RECI returned more.
Which is cheaper, CDPI or RECI?
CDPI charges 0.45% a year and RECI charges 0.30%, so RECI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CDPI against RECI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CDPI against RECI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cdpi-vs-reci Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources