Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CAIQ vs RECI: which paid, and which earned it?

CAIQ and RECI both write options for income.

Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF and Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF.

13.7%CAIQ cash paid, 1 year
0.7%RECI cash paid, 1 year
+16.7%CAIQ total return, 1 year
+2.4%RECI total return, 1 year
CAIQ7 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+23.6%CAIQ+16.7%13.7% of it arrived as cash7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.6%CAIQ+16.7%13.7% cash7 pts behind QQQ
RECI0.8 pts ahead of SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+1.6%RECI+2.4%0.8 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+1.6%RECI+2.4%0.8 pts ahead of SPY

Performance, window by window

CAIQ and RECI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
CAIQRECICAIQRECICAIQRECI
3 months−0.5%not published4.3%not published+1.9 ptsnot published
6 months+16.5%not published9.5%not published−7.7 ptsnot published
Since launch+16.7%+2.4%13.7%0.7%−7.0 pts+0.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CAIQ and RECI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CAIQ
Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
RECI
Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY
IssuerCalamosColumbia
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlynot established
Payout rate, annualized17.9%8.0%
Expense ratio0.74%0.30%
Cash paid, 1 year13.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025)0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)
Price change, 1 year+2.1%+1.7%
Total return, 1 year+16.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025)+2.4% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.6%+1.6%
Ahead or behind−7.0 pts+0.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age302 days66 days
Net assets$167mnot published

CAIQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Nov 20, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, CAIQ paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.9%, paid monthly.

RECI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, RECI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +1.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.0%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, CAIQ or RECI?
CAIQ charges 0.74% a year and RECI charges 0.30%, so RECI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CAIQ against RECI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CAIQ against RECI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-reci Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources