Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BPI vs XBTY: which paid, and which earned it?

BPI and XBTY both write options for income.

Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF.

5.4%BPI cash paid, 1 year
37.4%XBTY cash paid, 1 year
+5.4%BPI total return, 1 year
−42.9%XBTY total return, 1 year
BPI0.8 pts behind IBIT · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT+6.2%BPI+5.4%0.8 pts behind IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT+6.2%BPI+5.4%0.8 pts behind IBIT
XBTY11.8 pts behind IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%XBTY−42.9%11.8 pts behind IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%XBTY−42.9%11.8 pts behind IBIT

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BPI and XBTY hold 63% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions BPI and XBTY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingBPIXBTY
TREASURY BILL100.00%62.54%
Only in each
Only in BPIOnly in XBTY
Treasury Bill 37.46%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BPI and XBTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BPIXBTYBPIXBTYBPIXBTY
3 months+26.6%+6.9%4.0%8.4%−2.5 pts−22.3 pts
6 monthsnot published−1.3%not published23.0%not published−17.1 pts
1 yearnot published−42.9%not published37.4%not published−11.8 pts
Since launch+5.4%−34.0%5.4%60.0%−0.8 pts−11.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BPI and XBTY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BPI
Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF
Covered call on IBIT, paying monthly
XBTY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF
Synthetic covered call on IBIT, paying weekly
IssuerGrayscaleGraniteShares
Strategycovered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkBitcoin (IBIT)Bitcoin (IBIT)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized6.3%29.8%
Expense ratio0.65%1.15%
Cash paid, 1 year5.4% (since launch on Apr 30, 2026)37.4%
Price change, 1 year−0.8%−74.1%
Total return, 1 year+5.4% (since launch on Apr 30, 2026)−42.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+6.2%−31.1%
Ahead or behind−0.8 pts−11.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published92%
Age141 days493 days
Net assets$3m$10m

BPI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Apr 30, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, BPI paid 5.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.4%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned +6.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.

XBTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XBTY paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 74.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −42.9%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.8%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 92% of the distribution paid Aug 25, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, BPI or XBTY?
BPI charges 0.65% a year and XBTY charges 1.15%, so BPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BPI against XBTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BPI against XBTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bpi-vs-xbty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources