Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
BABW vs BBYY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BBYY paid 45.9% of its price in cash against BABW’s 26.6%, and returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BABW and BBYY
Net assets: $1.1m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill BABA WeeklyPay ETF, and $578,113 on Nov 3, 2026 for GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF.
8.8 pts behind BABA
BABW over 1 year: paid 26.6%, price −63.0%, total −44.1%, BABA −35.3%, −8.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
BABA
−35.3%
BABW
−44.1%
8.8 pts behind BABA
Total return, distributions reinvested
8.8 pts behind BABA
BABW over 1 year: paid 26.6%, price −63.0%, total −44.1%, BABA −35.3%, −8.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
BABA
−35.3%
BABW
−44.1%
8.8 pts behind BABA
26.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. BABW over 1 year: paid 26.6%, price −63.0%, total −44.1%, BABA −35.3%, −8.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.8.3 pts ahead of BABA
BBYY over 1 year: paid 45.9%, price −64.1%, total −27.0%, BABA −35.3%, +8.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
BABA
−35.3%
BBYY
−27.0%
8.3 pts ahead of BABA
Total return, distributions reinvested
8.3 pts ahead of BABA
BBYY over 1 year: paid 45.9%, price −64.1%, total −27.0%, BABA −35.3%, +8.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
BABA
−35.3%
BBYY
−27.0%
8.3 pts ahead of BABA
45.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. BBYY over 1 year: paid 45.9%, price −64.1%, total −27.0%, BABA −35.3%, +8.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
BABW costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.1 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | BABW | BBYY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −44.1% | −27.0% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 63.0% | fell 64.1% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Nov 3, 2026 payment | 94% of the Sep 22, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Alibaba (BABA) | Alibaba (BABA) |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 1.00% | 1.18% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $1.0m | $578,113 |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 77 income ETFs writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 52 weekly returns · each against BABAFrom Oct 2025 to Oct 2026, BBYY returned more: −30.0% to −50.9%. BBYY swung less: 19.9% to 46.8%. BBYY fell less at its worst: −31.7% to −52.0%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BABW | BBYY | BABA | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | −50.9% | −30.0% | −41.9% | BBYY | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | −50.9% | −30.0% | −41.9% | BBYY | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −68.0% | −65.6% | −42.5% | BBYY (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 46.8% | 19.9% | 39.2% | BBYY | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 34.5% | 17.6% | 28.6% | BBYY | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −52.0% | −31.7% | −44.8% | BBYY | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 156.8% | 18.0% | 100.0% | BABW | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 105.0% | 76.7% | 100.0% | BBYY | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 1.19 | 0.41 | 1.00 | BBYY lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 1.00 | 0.66 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | −1.37 | −1.88 | −1.29 | BABW | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −1.85 | −2.12 | −1.77 | BABW | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | −0.536 | −0.910 | −0.505 | BABW | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | −0.98 | −0.95 | −0.94 | BBYY (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | BABA | BABA | BABA | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −3.8% a year | −16.7% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −1.76 | −1.40 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −8.2% to +0.5% | −40.6% to +7.2% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | −1.73 | 0.50 | BBYY | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 7.8% | 25.8% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 52 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BABW and BBYY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BABW | BBYY | BABW | BBYY | BABW | BBYY |
| 3 months | −22.3% | −6.1% | 8.4% | 10.0% | −4.3 pts | +12.0 pts |
| 6 months | −31.1% | −14.7% | 14.3% | 19.8% | −6.2 pts | +10.2 pts |
| 1 year | −44.1% | −27.0% | 26.6% | 45.9% | −8.8 pts | +8.3 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: BABW Oct 2025 · BBYY Oct 2025 | −47.1% | −29.0% | 26.5% | 46.8% | −9.0 pts | +7.2 pts |
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BABW
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BABW paid 26.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 63.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −44.1%. Alibaba (BABA) returned −35.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 3, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
BBYY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BBYY paid 45.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 64.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −27.0%. Alibaba (BABA) returned −35.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 8.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 40.4%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 22, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BABW against BBYY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/babw-vs-bbyy
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). BABW against BBYY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/babw-vs-bbyy
[BABW against BBYY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/babw-vs-bbyy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.