Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACSP vs CDPI: which paid, and which earned it?

ACSP and CDPI both write options for income.

ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF and Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF.

0.0%ACSP cash paid, 1 year
0.7%CDPI cash paid, 1 year
−3.8%ACSP total return, 1 year
+0.5%CDPI total return, 1 year
ACSP2.1 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPY
CDPI4.1 pts behind SCHD · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+4.6%CDPI+0.5%4.1 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+4.6%CDPI+0.5%4.1 pts behind SCHD

Performance, window by window

ACSP and CDPI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACSPCDPIACSPCDPIACSPCDPI
Since launch−3.8%+0.5%0.0%0.7%−2.1 pts−4.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACSP and CDPI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACSP
ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on SPY
CDPI
Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SCHD
IssuerProSharesColumbia
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy
Paysnot establishednot established
Payout rate, annualizednot published8.2%
Expense ratio0.72%0.45%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−3.8%−0.2%
Total return, 1 year−3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)+0.5% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year−1.6%+4.6%
Ahead or behind−2.1 pts−4.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age35 days66 days
Net assets$27mnot published

ACSP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.

CDPI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, CDPI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.2%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACSP or CDPI?
ACSP charges 0.72% a year and CDPI charges 0.45%, so CDPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACSP against CDPI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against CDPI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-cdpi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources