Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACKY vs PAPI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year ACKY paid 13.9% of its price in cash against PAPI’s 7.9%, though PAPI returned more with it reinvested.

VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF.

13.9%ACKY cash paid, 1 year
7.9%PAPI cash paid, 1 year
−1.3%ACKY total return, 1 year
+12.8%PAPI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: PAPI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

ACKY 12.7PAPI 62.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ACKY17.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%ACKY−1.3%17.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%ACKY−1.3%17.9 pts behind SPY
PAPI3.8 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%PAPI+12.8%7.9% of it arrived as cash3.8 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%PAPI+12.8%3.8 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACKY and PAPI hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACKY and PAPI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACKYPAPI
Restaurant Brands International Inc8.22%0.49%
Microsoft Corp11.56%0.39%
Only in each
Only in ACKYOnly in PAPI
Brookfield Corp 11.16%Corning, Inc. 1.01%
Uber Technologies Inc 10.74%TD SYNNEX Corp. 0.81%
Pershing Square USA Ltd 10.50%Cisco Systems, Inc. 0.77%
Meta Platforms Inc 10.23%Power Integrations, Inc. 0.73%
Amazon.com Inc 9.95%Royalty Pharma plc 0.73%
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc 8.86%Millicom International Cellular SA 0.72%
Visa Inc 5.35%Avnet, Inc. 0.71%
Mastercard Inc 5.11%Texas Instruments, Inc. 0.71%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACKY and PAPI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACKYPAPIACKYPAPIACKYPAPI
3 months+0.8%+4.7%3.7%2.0%−1.5 pts+2.5 pts
6 months+5.8%+5.6%7.7%4.0%−12.2 pts−12.4 pts
1 year−1.3%+12.8%13.9%7.9%−17.9 pts−3.8 pts
Since launch−0.4%+35.6%14.0%22.5%−19.1 pts−49.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACKY and PAPI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACKY
VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
PAPI
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerVistaSharesParametric
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized15.7%7.2%
Expense ratio0.95%0.29%
Cash paid, 1 year13.9%7.9%
Price change, 1 year−15.1%+4.5%
Total return, 1 year−1.3%+12.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−17.9 pts−3.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age374 days1065 days
Net assets$45m$400m

ACKY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 15.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 17.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.7%, paid monthly.

PAPI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PAPI paid 7.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.2%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACKY or PAPI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting price in cash and PAPI paid 7.9%, so ACKY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACKY or PAPI?
With every distribution reinvested, ACKY returned −1.3% and PAPI returned +12.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so PAPI returned more.
Which is cheaper, ACKY or PAPI?
ACKY charges 0.95% a year and PAPI charges 0.29%, so PAPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACKY against PAPI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACKY against PAPI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acky-vs-papi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources