Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACKY vs GPIQ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year ACKY paid 13.9% of its price in cash against GPIQ’s 11.0%, though GPIQ returned more with it reinvested.

VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF.

13.9%ACKY cash paid, 1 year
11.0%GPIQ cash paid, 1 year
−1.3%ACKY total return, 1 year
+21.4%GPIQ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: GPIQ scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

ACKY 12.7GPIQ 78.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ACKY17.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%ACKY−1.3%17.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%ACKY−1.3%17.9 pts behind SPY
GPIQAbout even with QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%GPIQ+21.4%11.0% of it arrived as cashabout even with QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%GPIQ+21.4%about even with QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACKY and GPIQ hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACKY and GPIQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACKYGPIQ
Amazon.com Inc9.95%4.20%
Microsoft Corp11.56%3.96%
Meta Platforms Inc10.23%2.78%
Netflix Inc4.01%0.89%
Only in each
Only in ACKYOnly in GPIQ
Brookfield Corp 11.16%NVIDIA CORP 7.48%
Uber Technologies Inc 10.74%APPLE INC 6.59%
Pershing Square USA Ltd 10.50%MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.62%
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc 8.86%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 4.11%
Restaurant Brands International Inc 8.22%ALPHABET INC 3.54%
Visa Inc 5.35%TESLA INC 3.17%
Mastercard Inc 5.11%INTEL CORP 3.01%
S&P Global Inc 4.73%BROADCOM INC 2.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACKY and GPIQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACKYGPIQACKYGPIQACKYGPIQ
3 months+0.8%−1.7%3.7%2.5%−1.5 pts+0.8 pts
6 months+5.8%+20.5%7.7%5.9%−12.2 pts−3.7 pts
1 year−1.3%+21.4%13.9%11.0%−17.9 pts−0.4 pts
Since launch−0.4%+98.3%14.0%38.2%−19.1 pts−15.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACKY and GPIQ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACKY
VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerVistaSharesGoldman Sachs
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyNasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized15.7%10.5%
Expense ratio0.95%0.29%
Cash paid, 1 year13.9%11.0%
Price change, 1 year−15.1%+9.3%
Total return, 1 year−1.3%+21.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−17.9 pts−0.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age374 days1058 days
Net assets$45m$5.8bn

ACKY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 15.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 17.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.7%, paid monthly.

GPIQ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.5%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACKY or GPIQ?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting price in cash and GPIQ paid 11.0%, so ACKY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACKY or GPIQ?
With every distribution reinvested, ACKY returned −1.3% and GPIQ returned +21.4% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so GPIQ returned more.
Which is cheaper, ACKY or GPIQ?
ACKY charges 0.95% a year and GPIQ charges 0.29%, so GPIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACKY against GPIQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACKY against GPIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acky-vs-gpiq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources