Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
QYLD vs TSLY
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QYLD and TSLY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QYLD | Only in TSLY |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.56% | TREASURY BILL 22.62% |
| APPLE INC. 7.03% | TREASURY BILL 22.39% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.34% | TREASURY BILL 22.04% |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.02% | TREASURY BILL 20.60% |
| ALPHABET INC. 3.95% | TREASURY BILL 12.35% |
| ALPHABET INC. 3.66% | |
| BROADCOM INC. 3.49% | |
| TESLA, INC. 3.36% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYLD | TSLY | QYLD | TSLY | QYLD | TSLY | |
| 3 months | +6.3% | −8.8% | 3.1% | 11.3% | +4.2 pts | +0.7 pts |
| 6 months | +11.7% | −10.4% | 6.2% | 21.9% | −8.4 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 1 year | +23.5% | +7.7% | 12.7% | 55.9% | −2.1 pts | +3.1 pts |
| 3 years | +51.5% | +19.9% | 36.7% | 86.2% | −42.0 pts | −18.2 pts |
| Since launch | +195.3% | +35.2% | 116.0% | 97.0% | −644.5 pts | −58.0 pts |
| QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | TSLY YieldMax(R) TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Tesla (TSLA) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 11.9% | 48.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 1.07% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 12.7% | 55.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | +9.5% | −41.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.5% | +7.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +25.6% | +4.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.1 pts | +3.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 36% |
| Age | 4649 days | 1381 days |
QYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QYLD paid 12.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +23.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 11.9%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
TSLY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, TSLY paid 55.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 41.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.7%. Tesla (TSLA) returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 48.5%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 36% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, QYLD or TSLY?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QYLD paid 12.7% of its starting price in cash and TSLY paid 55.9%, so TSLY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, QYLD or TSLY?
- With every distribution reinvested, QYLD returned +23.5% and TSLY returned +7.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so QYLD returned more.
- Which is cheaper, QYLD or TSLY?
- QYLD charges 0.60% a year and TSLY charges 1.07%, so QYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QYLD against TSLY, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/QYLD-TSLY.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.