Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
AIPI vs QYLD
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AIPI and QYLD hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | AIPI | QYLD |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | 8.23% | 8.56% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 4.15% | 2.83% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | 2.52% | 5.34% |
| BROADCOM INC. | 2.46% | 3.49% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. | 2.41% | 3.18% |
| INTEL CORPORATION | 2.67% | 2.30% |
| ALPHABET INC. | 2.29% | 3.95% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. | 3.04% | 1.76% |
| PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. | 8.40% | 1.55% |
| QUALCOMM INCORPORATED | 3.29% | 0.93% |
| PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC. | 3.61% | 0.71% |
| CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS, INC. | 11.93% | 0.55% |
| Only in AIPI | Only in QYLD |
|---|---|
| Astera Labs, Inc 7.20% | APPLE INC. 7.03% |
| SUPER MICRO COMPUTER, INC. 3.95% | AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.02% |
| IONQ Inc 3.62% | ALPHABET INC. 3.66% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.32% | TESLA, INC. 3.36% |
| SERVICENOW, INC. 3.17% | WALMART INC. 3.14% |
| INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT 2.98% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 2.81% |
| APPLE INC. 2.58% | COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 2.19% |
| SALESFORCE, INC. 2.41% | NETFLIX, INC. 1.93% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIPI | QYLD | AIPI | QYLD | AIPI | QYLD | |
| 3 months | +7.3% | +6.3% | 8.4% | 3.1% | +4.5 pts | +4.2 pts |
| 6 months | +21.6% | +11.7% | 16.1% | 6.2% | −9.4 pts | −8.4 pts |
| 1 year | +25.5% | +23.5% | 31.2% | 12.7% | −17.3 pts | −2.1 pts |
| 3 years | n/a | +51.5% | n/a | 36.7% | n/a | −42.0 pts |
| Since launch | +54.8% | +195.3% | 63.2% | 116.0% | −37.0 pts | −644.5 pts |
| AIPI REX AI EQUITY PREMIUM INCOME ETF | QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | REX | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | AI and technology (AIQ), used as the AI proxy | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 35.0% | 11.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 31.2% | 12.7% |
| Price change, 1 year | −10.2% | +9.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | +25.5% | +23.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +42.9% | +25.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −17.3 pts | −2.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 100% |
| Age | 822 days | 4649 days |
AIPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, AIPI paid 31.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +25.5%. AI and technology (AIQ), used as the AI proxy returned +42.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 17.3 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 35.0%, paid weekly. REX estimates that 100% of the distribution paid was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
QYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QYLD paid 12.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +23.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 11.9%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, AIPI or QYLD?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, AIPI paid 31.2% of its starting price in cash and QYLD paid 12.7%, so AIPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, AIPI or QYLD?
- With every distribution reinvested, AIPI returned +25.5% and QYLD returned +23.5% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so AIPI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, AIPI or QYLD?
- AIPI charges 0.65% a year and QYLD charges 0.60%, so QYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIPI against QYLD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/AIPI-QYLD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.