ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

FEPI vs QYLD

REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF, side by side on the income desk.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and QYLD hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FEPI and QYLD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFEPIQYLD
NVIDIA CORPORATION7.76%8.56%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION5.19%5.34%
ALPHABET INC.8.83%3.95%
BROADCOM INC.8.05%3.49%
TESLA, INC.7.47%3.36%
META PLATFORMS, INC.5.14%3.18%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.8.91%2.83%
INTEL CORPORATION5.24%2.30%
NETFLIX, INC.5.16%1.93%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC.5.17%1.55%
APPLOVIN CORPORATION5.16%0.67%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FEPIOnly in QYLD
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 9.98%APPLE INC. 7.03%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.21%AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.02%
ORACLE CORPORATION 5.16%ALPHABET INC. 3.66%
APPLE INC. 5.14%WALMART INC. 3.14%
United States of America 2.42%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 2.81%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 2.19%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.76%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 1.57%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FEPI and QYLD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FEPIQYLDFEPIQYLDFEPIQYLD
3 months+2.7%+6.3%6.0%3.1%+0.6 pts+4.2 pts
6 months+14.8%+11.7%11.7%6.2%−5.3 pts−8.4 pts
1 year+17.8%+23.5%23.2%12.7%−7.8 pts−2.1 pts
3 yearsn/a+51.5%n/a36.7%n/a−42.0 pts
Since launch+66.6%+195.3%66.0%116.0%−30.1 pts−644.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FEPI and QYLD on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FEPI
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
IssuerREXGlobal X
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxyNasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualised25.1%11.9%
Expense ratio0.65%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year23.2%12.7%
Price change, 1 year−7.5%+9.5%
Total return, 1 year+17.8%+23.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+25.6%+25.6%
Ahead or behind−7.8 pts−2.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age1059 days4649 days

FEPI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, FEPI paid 23.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.8%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 25.1%, paid weekly.

QYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QYLD paid 12.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +23.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 11.9%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FEPI or QYLD?
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, FEPI paid 23.2% of its starting price in cash and QYLD paid 12.7%, so FEPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or QYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +17.8% and QYLD returned +23.5% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so QYLD returned more.
Which is cheaper, FEPI or QYLD?
FEPI charges 0.65% a year and QYLD charges 0.60%, so QYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FEPI against QYLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FEPI against QYLD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/FEPI-QYLD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources