Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
QDTE vs XYLD
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and XYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QDTE | Only in XYLD |
|---|---|
| Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 100.00% | NVIDIA CORPORATION 7.85% |
| APPLE INC. 6.45% | |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.90% | |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. 4.19% | |
| ALPHABET INC. 3.63% | |
| BROADCOM INC. 3.20% | |
| ALPHABET INC. 2.89% | |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDTE | XYLD | QDTE | XYLD | QDTE | XYLD | |
| 3 months | +3.6% | +5.7% | 8.0% | 2.6% | +1.5 pts | +0.2 pts |
| 6 months | +15.3% | +9.5% | 15.8% | 5.5% | −4.8 pts | −5.5 pts |
| 1 year | +24.7% | +18.6% | 37.4% | 11.1% | −0.9 pts | −4.1 pts |
| 3 years | n/a | +43.7% | n/a | 33.0% | n/a | −33.1 pts |
| Since launch | +58.7% | +191.1% | 73.5% | 112.9% | −4.9 pts | −137.7 pts |
| QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | Global X |
| Strategy | 0DTE covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | All-country world (ACWI) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 25.1% | 9.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.96% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 37.4% | 11.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | −17.0% | +6.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.7% | +18.6% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +25.6% | +22.7% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.9 pts | −4.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 93% |
| Age | 911 days | 4820 days |
QDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QDTE paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 25.1%, paid weekly.
XYLD in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, XYLD paid 11.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. All-country world (ACWI) returned +22.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 9.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, QDTE or XYLD?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QDTE paid 37.4% of its starting price in cash and XYLD paid 11.1%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or XYLD?
- With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +24.7% and XYLD returned +18.6% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
- Which is cheaper, QDTE or XYLD?
- QDTE charges 0.96% a year and XYLD charges 0.60%, so XYLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against XYLD, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/QDTE-XYLD.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.