Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
QDTE vs TSLY
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and YieldMax(R) TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF, side by side on the income desk.
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ| QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | TSLY YieldMax(R) TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | YieldMax |
| Strategy | 0DTE covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Tesla (TSLA) |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 25.1% | 48.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.96% | 1.07% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 37.4% | 55.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | −17.0% | −41.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.7% | +7.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +25.6% | +4.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.9 pts | +3.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 36% |
| Age | 911 days | 1381 days |
QDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QDTE paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 25.1%, paid weekly.
TSLY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, TSLY paid 55.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 41.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.7%. Tesla (TSLA) returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 48.5%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 36% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, QDTE or TSLY?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QDTE paid 37.4% of its starting price in cash and TSLY paid 55.9%, so TSLY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or TSLY?
- With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +24.7% and TSLY returned +7.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
- Which is cheaper, QDTE or TSLY?
- QDTE charges 0.96% a year and TSLY charges 1.07%, so QDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against TSLY, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/QDTE-TSLY.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources