Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
ISPY vs JEPI
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ISPY and JEPI hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ISPY | JEPI |
|---|---|---|
| Apple, Inc. | 6.31% | 1.53% |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 7.07% | 1.53% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 3.05% | 1.52% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. | 3.64% | 1.48% |
| Broadcom, Inc. | 2.92% | 1.33% |
| Microsoft Corp. | 4.60% | 1.30% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. | 1.91% | 1.22% |
| Eli Lilly & Co. | 1.21% | 1.05% |
| Visa, Inc. | 0.76% | 1.42% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 0.75% | 1.68% |
| Walmart, Inc. | 0.70% | 0.92% |
| Costco Wholesale Corp. | 0.58% | 1.12% |
| Only in ISPY | Only in JEPI |
|---|---|
| ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF 10.56% | BNP Paribas Issuance BV 0.97% |
| Alphabet, Inc. 2.42% | BNP Paribas Issuance BV 0.96% |
| Tesla, Inc. 1.69% | Barclays Bank plc 0.95% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. 1.50% | National Bank of Canada 0.95% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. 1.11% | BNP Paribas Issuance BV 0.94% |
| Intel Corp. 0.74% | Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. 0.94% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 0.66% | BofA Finance LLC 0.93% |
| Caterpillar, Inc. 0.56% | Royal Bank of Canada 0.92% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISPY | JEPI | ISPY | JEPI | ISPY | JEPI | |
| 3 months | +3.6% | +5.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | −1.1 pts | +0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +11.8% | +2.7% | 3.5% | 4.1% | −3.3 pts | −12.4 pts |
| 1 year | +16.9% | +9.2% | 5.7% | 8.1% | −3.1 pts | −10.7 pts |
| 3 years | n/a | +31.9% | n/a | 24.6% | n/a | −46.0 pts |
| Since launch | +54.6% | +96.0% | 25.8% | 60.9% | −14.8 pts | −89.0 pts |
| ISPY ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF | JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | JPMorgan |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 5.8% | 7.8% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 5.7% | 8.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | +10.8% | +0.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.9% | +9.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Ahead or behind | −3.1 pts | −10.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 989 days | 2297 days |
ISPY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, ISPY paid 5.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 10.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 5.8%, paid monthly.
JEPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, JEPI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.7 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 7.8%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, ISPY or JEPI?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, ISPY paid 5.7% of its starting price in cash and JEPI paid 8.1%, so JEPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, ISPY or JEPI?
- With every distribution reinvested, ISPY returned +16.9% and JEPI returned +9.2% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so ISPY returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ISPY against JEPI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ISPY-JEPI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.