ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

APLY vs ISPY

YieldMax(R) AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF and ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF, side by side on the income desk.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, APLY and ISPY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in APLYOnly in ISPY
TREASURY BILL 27.23%ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF 10.56%
TREASURY BILL 19.97%NVIDIA Corp. 7.07%
TREASURY BILL 19.80%Apple, Inc. 6.31%
TREASURY BILL 19.47%Microsoft Corp. 4.60%
TREASURY BILL 13.52%Amazon.com, Inc. 3.64%
Alphabet, Inc. 3.05%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.92%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

Performance, window by window

APLY and ISPY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
APLYISPYAPLYISPYAPLYISPY
3 months+0.6%+3.6%8.1%1.5%−3.6 pts−1.1 pts
6 months+15.5%+11.8%17.8%3.5%−9.0 pts−3.3 pts
1 year+18.6%+16.9%30.9%5.7%−15.3 pts−3.1 pts
3 years+39.1%n/a65.7%n/a−31.8 ptsn/a
Since launch+51.5%+54.6%74.1%25.8%−43.8 pts−14.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
APLY and ISPY on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
APLY
YieldMax(R) AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
ISPY
ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF
IssuerYieldMaxProShares
Strategysynthetic covered callcovered call
BenchmarkApple (AAPL)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualised26.2%5.8%
Expense ratio1.04%not published
Cash paid, 1 year30.9%5.7%
Price change, 1 year−14.8%+10.8%
Total return, 1 year+18.6%+16.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+33.9%+20.0%
Ahead or behind−15.3 pts−3.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate92%not published
Age1235 days989 days

APLY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, APLY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. Apple (AAPL) returned +33.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.3 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 26.2%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 92% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

ISPY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, ISPY paid 5.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 10.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.1 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 5.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, APLY or ISPY?
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, APLY paid 30.9% of its starting price in cash and ISPY paid 5.7%, so APLY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, APLY or ISPY?
With every distribution reinvested, APLY returned +18.6% and ISPY returned +16.9% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so APLY returned more.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

APLY against ISPY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, APLY against ISPY, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/APLY-ISPY.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources