Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
GPIX vs QQQI
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GPIX and QQQI hold 53% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | GPIX | QQQI |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 7.33% | 7.66% |
| APPLE INC | 6.47% | 6.63% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 3.90% | 4.38% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 3.39% | 4.05% |
| ALPHABET INC | 4.37% | 3.32% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.80% | 2.82% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 2.02% | 5.61% |
| TESLA INC | 1.89% | 3.35% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 1.67% | 2.65% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 1.48% | 4.12% |
| ALPHABET INC | 1.46% | 3.07% |
| INTEL CORP | 1.02% | 2.99% |
| Only in GPIX | Only in QQQI |
|---|---|
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 1.51% | ASML Holding NV 0.76% |
| ELI LILLY & COMPANY 1.48% | Shopify Inc 0.61% |
| JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 1.36% | MercadoLibre Inc 0.37% |
| VISA INC 0.99% | Astera Labs Inc 0.35% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.96% | Nebius Group NV 0.26% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.95% | Rocket Lab Corp 0.26% |
| CATERPILLAR INC 0.78% | PDD Holdings Inc 0.23% |
| MASTERCARD INC 0.74% | ARM Holdings PLC 0.22% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIX | QQQI | GPIX | QQQI | GPIX | QQQI | |
| 3 months | +4.9% | +2.9% | 2.2% | 3.5% | +0.2 pts | +0.8 pts |
| 6 months | +13.8% | +13.4% | 4.5% | 7.4% | −1.3 pts | −6.8 pts |
| 1 year | +19.5% | +18.7% | 8.9% | 14.4% | −0.4 pts | −6.9 pts |
| Since launch | +81.7% | +58.8% | 30.5% | 38.6% | −11.4 pts | −12.6 pts |
| GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | NEOS |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 8.5% | 14.3% |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.68% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.9% | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +9.8% | +3.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.5% | +18.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +20.0% | +25.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.4 pts | −6.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 98% |
| Age | 1044 days | 948 days |
GPIX in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIX paid 8.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 8.5%, paid monthly.
QQQI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QQQI paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 14.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, GPIX or QQQI?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIX paid 8.9% of its starting price in cash and QQQI paid 14.4%, so QQQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIX or QQQI?
- With every distribution reinvested, GPIX returned +19.5% and QQQI returned +18.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so GPIX returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIX against QQQI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/GPIX-QQQI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.