Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
DIVO vs QQQI
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DIVO and QQQI hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DIVO | QQQI |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 5.30% | 6.63% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.12% | 4.38% |
| Walmart Inc | 3.29% | 2.36% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 2.25% | 7.66% |
| Amgen Inc | 4.36% | 0.85% |
| Only in DIVO | Only in QQQI |
|---|---|
| Caterpillar Inc 7.26% | Micron Technology Inc 5.61% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 5.05% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.12% |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 4.78% | Amazon.com Inc 4.05% |
| American Express Co 4.70% | Tesla Inc 3.35% |
| TJX Cos Inc/The 4.61% | Alphabet Inc 3.32% |
| Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF 4.48% | Alphabet Inc 3.07% |
| CME Group Inc 4.14% | Intel Corp 2.99% |
| Chevron Corp 4.12% | Broadcom Inc 2.82% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIVO | QQQI | DIVO | QQQI | DIVO | QQQI | |
| 3 months | +6.3% | +2.9% | 1.2% | 3.5% | +1.6 pts | +0.8 pts |
| 6 months | +8.1% | +13.4% | 2.4% | 7.4% | −7.1 pts | −6.8 pts |
| 1 year | +17.9% | +18.7% | 6.9% | 14.4% | −2.0 pts | −6.9 pts |
| 3 years | +59.0% | n/a | 19.0% | n/a | −19.0 pts | n/a |
| Since launch | +225.7% | +58.8% | 72.4% | 38.6% | −72.8 pts | −12.6 pts |
| DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Amplify | NEOS |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 4.8% | 14.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.56% | 0.68% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.9% | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +10.4% | +3.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.9% | +18.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +20.0% | +25.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.0 pts | −6.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 98% |
| Age | 3551 days | 948 days |
DIVO in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, DIVO paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 4.8%, paid monthly.
QQQI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QQQI paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 14.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DIVO or QQQI?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, DIVO paid 6.9% of its starting price in cash and QQQI paid 14.4%, so QQQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DIVO or QQQI?
- With every distribution reinvested, DIVO returned +17.9% and QQQI returned +18.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so QQQI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DIVO or QQQI?
- DIVO charges 0.56% a year and QQQI charges 0.68%, so DIVO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIVO against QQQI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/DIVO-QQQI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.