ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

GPIQ vs SDTY

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF and YieldMax(R) S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, side by side on the income desk.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GPIQ and SDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GPIQOnly in SDTY
NVIDIA CORP 7.48%TREASURY BILL 92.47%
APPLE INC 6.59%TREASURY BILL 3.84%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.62%TREASURY BILL 3.68%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.20%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 4.11%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.96%
ALPHABET INC 3.54%
TESLA INC 3.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GPIQ and SDTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GPIQSDTYGPIQSDTYGPIQSDTY
3 months+2.4%+5.3%2.6%6.2%+0.3 pts+0.6 pts
6 months+17.1%+13.1%5.8%13.8%−3.1 pts−2.0 pts
1 year+24.2%+18.8%11.3%24.8%−1.4 pts−1.2 pts
Since launch+97.4%+22.5%38.2%34.7%−15.2 pts−6.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GPIQ and SDTY on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
SDTY
YieldMax(R) S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
IssuerGoldman SachsYieldMax
Strategycovered call0DTE covered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualised10.5%20.9%
Expense rationot published1.08%
Cash paid, 1 year11.3%24.8%
Price change, 1 year+11.8%−8.4%
Total return, 1 year+24.2%+18.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+25.6%+20.0%
Ahead or behind−1.4 pts−1.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published43%
Age1044 days575 days

GPIQ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 11.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 10.5%, paid monthly.

SDTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, SDTY paid 24.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 20.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 43% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, GPIQ or SDTY?
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.3% of its starting price in cash and SDTY paid 24.8%, so SDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIQ or SDTY?
With every distribution reinvested, GPIQ returned +24.2% and SDTY returned +18.8% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so GPIQ returned more.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GPIQ against SDTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIQ against SDTY, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/GPIQ-SDTY.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources