ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

DIVO vs SDTY

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF and YieldMax(R) S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, side by side on the income desk.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DIVO and SDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DIVOOnly in SDTY
Caterpillar Inc 7.26%TREASURY BILL 92.47%
Apple Inc 5.30%TREASURY BILL 3.84%
Microsoft Corp 5.12%TREASURY BILL 3.68%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 5.05%
Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 4.78%
American Express Co 4.70%
TJX Cos Inc/The 4.61%
Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF 4.48%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

DIVO and SDTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
DIVOSDTYDIVOSDTYDIVOSDTY
3 months+6.3%+5.3%1.2%6.2%+1.6 pts+0.6 pts
6 months+8.1%+13.1%2.4%13.8%−7.1 pts−2.0 pts
1 year+17.9%+18.8%6.9%24.8%−2.0 pts−1.2 pts
3 years+59.0%n/a19.0%n/a−19.0 ptsn/a
Since launch+225.7%+22.5%72.4%34.7%−72.8 pts−6.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DIVO and SDTY on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
SDTY
YieldMax(R) S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
IssuerAmplifyYieldMax
Strategydividend stocks with call overlay0DTE covered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualised4.8%20.9%
Expense ratio0.56%1.08%
Cash paid, 1 year6.9%24.8%
Price change, 1 year+10.4%−8.4%
Total return, 1 year+17.9%+18.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+20.0%+20.0%
Ahead or behind−2.0 pts−1.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published43%
Age3551 days575 days

DIVO in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, DIVO paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 4.8%, paid monthly.

SDTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, SDTY paid 24.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 20.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 43% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DIVO or SDTY?
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, DIVO paid 6.9% of its starting price in cash and SDTY paid 24.8%, so SDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DIVO or SDTY?
With every distribution reinvested, DIVO returned +17.9% and SDTY returned +18.8% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so SDTY returned more.
Which is cheaper, DIVO or SDTY?
DIVO charges 0.56% a year and SDTY charges 1.08%, so DIVO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DIVO against SDTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIVO against SDTY, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/DIVO-SDTY.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources