Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
DIVO vs QQQI
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF and NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF, side by side on the income desk.
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ| DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Amplify | NEOS |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 4.8% | 14.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.56% | 0.68% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.9% | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +10.4% | +3.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.9% | +18.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +20.0% | +25.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.0 pts | −6.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 98% |
| Age | 3551 days | 948 days |
DIVO in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, DIVO paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 4.8%, paid monthly.
QQQI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QQQI paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 14.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DIVO or QQQI?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, DIVO paid 6.9% of its starting price in cash and QQQI paid 14.4%, so QQQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DIVO or QQQI?
- With every distribution reinvested, DIVO returned +17.9% and QQQI returned +18.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so QQQI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DIVO or QQQI?
- DIVO charges 0.56% a year and QQQI charges 0.68%, so DIVO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIVO against QQQI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/DIVO-QQQI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
ETFIQ is an independent publisher of exchange-traded fund data. It is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and it makes no recommendations; every figure here is stated arithmetic on published data. Standards and sources