Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

OSOL vs SOLZ: which tracked its coin?

OSOL closed unchanged on more than a twentieth of its trading days, so its difference from Solana is not comparable with SOLZ’s.

Osprey Solana Trust and Solana ETF, side by side, crypto ETFs on ETFIQ.

−8.0%OSOL returned, year
−57.3%SOLZ returned, year
not comparableOSOL against Solana
−4.7%SOLZ against Solana
OSOLThinly traded, not compared · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
Solana−55.23%OSOL−7.95%Total return, 1 year, fund against the coinSolana−55.23%OSOL−7.95%Total return, 1 year
SOLZ4.7% from Solana, compounded: not the coin's return · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
Solana−55.23%SOLZ−57.31%4.65% behind, compoundedTotal return, 1 year, fund against the coinSolana−55.23%SOLZ−57.31%4.65% behind, compoundedTotal return, 1 year

The same coin, two trusts

OSOL and SOLZ hold the same asset. Both are 1933 Act trusts holding Solana through a custodian, so neither has a portfolio to compare: the whole of each fund is one line. OSOL closed unchanged on more than a twentieth of its trading days, so its distance from Solana is a quote nobody moved rather than a cost a holder paid, and ETFIQ neither prints it nor ranks it. OSOL has 997 more days of record than SOLZ, and a longer record is a longer window over which a cost can show itself.

Performance, window by window

OSOL and SOLZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnThe coin over the same daysDifference, percentage points
OSOLSOLZOSOLSOLZOSOLSOLZ
1 month0.0%+34.4%+35.6%+35.6%not comparable−1.1 pts
3 months+156.3%+52.6%+53.4%+53.4%not comparable−0.8 pts
6 months+105.0%+13.6%+16.1%+16.1%not comparable−2.5 pts
1 year−8.0%−57.3%−55.2%−55.2%not comparable−4.7% of its growth
Since each listed+257.3%−29.1%+166.2%−19.7%not comparable−11.8% of its growth
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
OSOL and SOLZ on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
OSOL
Osprey Solana Trust
Holds Solana through a custodian, listed Jun 27, 2022, quoted thinly
SOLZ
Solana ETF
Holds Solana through a custodian, listed Mar 20, 2025
SponsorOspreySolana
HoldsSolanaSolana
Net assetsnot readnot read
Sponsor’s fee2.50%not read
Fee waivernonenone
Stakingthe filings say it doespossible; no clear answer read
ListedJun 27, 2022Mar 20, 2025
Days since listing1,537 days540 days
Days it has traded1,056372
Days it closed unchanged2041
Quotedthinly, and not ranked against funds that trade dailyon an exchange, every trading day
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−8.0%−57.3%
The coin over the same days−55.2%−55.2%
Difference, percentage pointsnot comparable−4.7% of its growth
Fund returned since it listed+257.3%−29.1%
Difference since it listednot comparable−11.8% of its growth
Price$2.2804$10.16

OSOL in plain words

OSOL holds Solana through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, Solana moved −55.2% and OSOL returned −8.0%. That leaves it not comparable. That difference is the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks, and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin, all of it together. It is the only figure on this page the sponsor does not publish itself. OSOL closed unchanged on 204 of its 1056 trading days. A price that does not move is a price nobody traded at, so its difference against Solana describes the days somebody did trade rather than the fund, and ETFIQ does not rank it against funds that trade every day. Solana is a proof of stake chain, so a fund holding it can stake. OSOL’s own filings say it does (S-1, Oct 22, 2025). Over the window ETFIQ measures it did not finish ahead of Solana’s own price, so whatever it earned did not cover its costs. A spot trust is not a registered investment company. It files a 10-K rather than an N-PORT, and its holding is one line: the Solana it custodies.

SOLZ in plain words

SOLZ holds Solana through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, Solana moved −55.2% and SOLZ returned −57.3%. That leaves it 4.7% behind once both returns are compounded. Over a window this long the two returns cannot simply be subtracted. Doing it would read −2.1 pts, which is arithmetically correct and describes nothing a holder can act on: what the figure above states is the gap between the two growth factors, so a fund that kept 95% of what holding the coin gave says exactly that.

Questions people ask

Can OSOL and SOLZ be compared on tracking?
OSOL closed unchanged on more than a twentieth of its trading days. A price that does not move is a price nobody traded at, so the difference from Solana describes the days somebody did trade rather than the fund, and ETFIQ publishes it nowhere and ranks it against nothing.
Do OSOL or SOLZ pay a staking yield?
Solana is a proof of stake chain, so staking is possible. Whether either trust stakes, and what the sponsor keeps of it, is a term in its own filings and is read from those rather than assumed.
What is the difference between OSOL and SOLZ?
Both hold Solana through a custodian and both trade on an exchange, so what separates them is what each costs a holder over time. OSOL is sponsored by Osprey and listed Jun 27, 2022; SOLZ by Solana, listed Mar 20, 2025.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

OSOL against SOLZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, OSOL against SOLZ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/OSOL-SOLZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources