Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Buffer ETFs

FEBM vs MARU: Cap, Buffer & Days Left

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

As of Nov 4, 2026 MARU can fall 8.2% before its buffer engages and FEBM 4.7%, and FEBM resets 9 days sooner.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FEBM and MARU

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $46m for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - February and $35m for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETF - Mar.

At a glance
4.7%
FEBM can fall this far before its buffer
8.2%
MARU can fall this far before its buffer
2.0%
FEBM can still gain
uncapped
MARU can still gain
FEBM At its cap
At its capFEBM: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +4.1%; buffer 0 to −47; cap +7.0%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.47.3 pts of buffer+7%−47.3% floor0% period start+7.0% capTODAY · SPY +11.2%At its capFEBM: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +4.1%; buffer 0 to −47; cap +7.0%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.47.3 pts of buffer−47.3% floor0% start+7.0% cap+7% gain capturedTODAY · SPY +11.2%

FEBM: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +4.1%; buffer 0 to −47; cap +7.0%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FEBM: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +4.1%; buffer 0 to −47; cap +7.0%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MARU No cap
No capMARU: reference +11.8% since period start, fund +8.1%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.15 pts of buffer−15.0% floor0% period startno cap+11.8% gained, no capTODAY · SPY +11.8%No capMARU: reference +11.8% since period start, fund +8.1%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.15 pts−15.0% floor0% startno cap+11.8% gained, no capTODAY · SPY +11.8%

MARU: reference +11.8% since period start, fund +8.1%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

MARU: reference +11.8% since period start, fund +8.1%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

MARU costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.6 points; FEBM is 1.3 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FEBM vs MARU: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
MeasureFEBMMARU
Return
Total return, 1 year+6.1%+8.7%
Drawdown
Index fall to the buffer10.1%10.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksSPYSPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.85%0.74%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$46m$35m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
ETFIQ Downside Cover Score · FEBM scores higher If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?
IQ Buffer Score92.6FEBM53.9MARU

How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Window by window

Window by window: FEBM vs MARU: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
Total returnGap to the reference's price return
WindowFEBMMARUFEBMMARU
3 months+1.0%−1.2%+1.4 pts−0.8 pts
6 months+2.6%+2.5%−1.9 pts−2.0 pts
1 year+6.1%+8.7%−7.4 pts−4.9 pts
Since launchNot the same days: FEBM Feb 2025 · MARU Mar 2025+10.6%+21.7%−17.8 pts−9.7 pts

Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

FEBM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - February · Absorbs the first 47% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 7.0%, over a period ending Feb 19, 2027 MARU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETF - Mar · Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and does not cap the gain, over a period ending Feb 28, 2027
Reference index SPY SPY
Buffer 47% 15%
Outcome period Feb 23, 2026 to Feb 19, 2027 Mar 1, 2026 to Feb 28, 2027
Days left 107 116
Starting cap +7.0% uncapped
Can still gain 2.0% uncapped
Fall before buffer 4.7% 8.2%
Protection left, index points 47.3% of 47.3% 15.0% of 15.0%
Index return this period +11.2% +11.8%
Fund return this period +4.1% +8.1%
State today At cap Uncapped
Expense ratio 0.85% 0.74%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $46m $35m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

FEBM is already at its cap, so more rise in the index adds nothing to it before the period ends.

Where each one stands today

FEBM resets first, on Feb 19, 2027, 107 days from now; MARU runs to Feb 28, 2027, 116 days. A fall from here reaches FEBM’s buffer after 4.7% and MARU’s after 8.2%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Alert

FEBM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FEBM

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +7.0% for the period on Nov 4, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 2.0% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 4.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 47.3% of the 47.3% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 107 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Feb 19, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

MARU

This fund has no cap. It takes a share of any further rise in SPY. The fund's price can fall 8.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 116 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Feb 28, 2027 the period ends and new terms are set.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, FEBM or MARU?
FEBM ends its outcome period on Feb 19, 2027 and MARU on Feb 28, 2027. New terms are set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, FEBM or MARU?
FEBM charges 0.85% a year and MARU charges 0.74%, so MARU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FEBM against MARU, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/febm-vs-maru

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.