Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Buffer ETFs

DMAY vs JUNW: Cap, Buffer & Days Left

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

As of Nov 4, 2026 DMAY can fall 8.7% before its buffer engages and JUNW 2.7%, and DMAY resets 10 days sooner.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DMAY and JUNW

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $390m for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May and $377m for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 ETF - Jun.

At a glance
8.7%
DMAY can fall this far before its buffer
2.7%
JUNW can fall this far before its buffer
9.3%
DMAY can still gain
9.1%
JUNW can still gain
DMAY Between buffer and cap
Between buffer and capDMAY: reference +3.7% since period start, fund +3.1%; buffer −5 to −30; cap +13.6%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.25 pts of buffer+3.7%+9.8% to cap−30.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% period start+13.6% capfirst 5 pts are yours to loseTODAY · SPY +3.7%Between buffer and capDMAY: reference +3.7% since period start, fund +3.1%; buffer −5 to −30; cap +13.6%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.25 pts of buffer−30.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% start+13.6% capfirst 5 pts are yours to lose+3.7% gain captured+9.8% more to the capTODAY · SPY +3.7%

DMAY: reference +3.7% since period start, fund +3.1%; buffer −5 to −30; cap +13.6%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

DMAY: reference +3.7% since period start, fund +3.1%; buffer −5 to −30; cap +13.6%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
JUNW Between buffer and cap
Between buffer and capJUNW: reference +1.4% since period start, fund +2.0%; buffer 0 to −20; cap +12.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.20 pts of buffer+10.7% to cap−20.0% floor0% period start+12.0% cap+1.4% gain capturedTODAY · SPY +1.4%Between buffer and capJUNW: reference +1.4% since period start, fund +2.0%; buffer 0 to −20; cap +12.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.20 pts−20.0% floor0% start+12.0% cap+1.4% gain captured+10.7% more to the capTODAY · SPY +1.4%

JUNW: reference +1.4% since period start, fund +2.0%; buffer 0 to −20; cap +12.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

JUNW: reference +1.4% since period start, fund +2.0%; buffer 0 to −20; cap +12.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

JUNW costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.7 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DMAY vs JUNW: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
MeasureDMAYJUNW
Return
Total return, 1 year+8.3%+6.6%
Drawdown
Index fall to the buffer8.4%1.3%
Benchmark
What it tracksSPYSPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.85%0.74%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$390m$377m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
ETFIQ Downside Cover Score · JUNW scores higher If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?
IQ Buffer Score51.2DMAY94.3JUNW

How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Jun 9, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 177 weekly returns · each against SPY
DMAY JUNW
Return
Total return edge DMAY +41.6% +37.1%
Annualized edge DMAY (slight) +10.8% +9.7%
Price return edge DMAY +41.6% +37.1%
Risk
Volatility edge JUNW 8.0% 6.1%
Max drawdown edge JUNW −11.6% −7.8%
Downside capture 54.1% 39.6%
Beta 0.53 0.40
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge JUNW (slight) 0.75 0.80
Sortino edge JUNW (slight) 1.15 1.24
Treynor 0.113 0.122
Calmar edge JUNW 0.93 1.25
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.6% a year −0.9% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.00 −0.66
Information ratio −1.15 −1.08
Tracking error 7.2% 8.7%
Reading

From Jun 2023 to Oct 2026, DMAY returned more: +41.6% to +37.1%. JUNW swung less: 6.1% to 8.0%. JUNW fell less at its worst: −7.8% to −11.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: DMAY vs JUNW: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
MeasureDMAYJUNWSPYEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+41.6%+37.1%DMAYPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.8%+9.7%DMAY (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+41.6%+37.1%DMAYPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility8.0%6.1%JUNWSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation5.2%4.0%JUNWLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−11.6%−7.8%JUNWDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture39.6%29.8%100.0%DMAYShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture54.1%39.6%100.0%JUNWShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.530.401.00JUNW lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.870.851.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.750.80JUNW (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.151.24JUNW (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1130.1220.143JUNW (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.931.25JUNWAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYSPYSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.6% a year−0.9% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.00−0.66Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−4.8% to +1.6%−3.4% to +1.7%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−1.15−1.08JUNW (slight)Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.2%8.7%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 177 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Window by window

Window by window: DMAY vs JUNW: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
Total returnGap to the reference's price return
WindowDMAYJUNWDMAYJUNW
3 months+0.5%+0.5%+0.9 pts+0.8 pts
6 months+3.2%+2.2%−1.3 pts−2.3 pts
1 year+8.3%+6.6%−5.2 pts−7.0 pts
3 years+40.5%+35.4%−35.9 pts−41.0 pts
Since launchNot the same days: DMAY May 2020 · JUNW Jun 2023+56.5%+39.2%−103.4 pts−42.6 pts

Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

DMAY FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May · Absorbs losses from 5.0% to 30.0% on SPY and caps the gain at 13.6%, over a period ending May 21, 2027 JUNW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 ETF - Jun · Absorbs the first 20% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 12.0%, over a period ending May 31, 2027
Reference index SPY SPY
Buffer 5% to 30% 20%
Outcome period May 18, 2026 to May 21, 2027 Jun 1, 2026 to May 31, 2027
Days left 198 208
Starting cap +13.6% +12.0%
Can still gain 9.3% 9.1%
Fall before buffer 8.7% 2.7%
Protection left, index points 25.0% of 25.0% 20.0% of 20.0%
Index return this period +3.7% +1.4%
Fund return this period +3.1% +2.0%
State today Open Open
Expense ratio 0.85% 0.74%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $390m $377m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Where each one stands today

DMAY resets first, on May 21, 2027, 198 days from now; JUNW runs to May 31, 2027, 208 days. DMAY can still gain 9.3% before its cap, JUNW 9.1%. A fall from here reaches DMAY’s buffer after 8.7% and JUNW’s after 2.7%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

DMAY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
DMAY

From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 9.3% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 8.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 8.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 25.0% of the 25.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 198 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On May 21, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

JUNW

From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 9.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.3% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 20.0% of the 20.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 208 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On May 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, DMAY or JUNW?
From their prices on Nov 4, 2026, DMAY can gain about 9.3% before its cap and JUNW about 9.1%, so DMAY has more room left this period.
Which resets first, DMAY or JUNW?
DMAY ends its outcome period on May 21, 2027 and JUNW on May 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, DMAY or JUNW?
DMAY charges 0.85% a year and JUNW charges 0.74%, so JUNW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DMAY against JUNW, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dmay-vs-junw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.