Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 19, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

VOO vs XMAR: how they differ

Over the year VOO returned more, +16.6% to XMAR's +11.1%, and VOO charges 0.03% to XMAR's 0.85%.

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March.

VOO and XMAR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 19, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
XMAR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March
Where it sitsCore fundBuffer ETF
IssuerVanguardFirst Trust
What it isTracks the S&P 500Defined outcome, 15% on SPY
Total return, 1 year+16.6%+11.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+16.6%+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.85%
Holdings508not filed
Net assets$1000.0bn$154m

VOO in plain words

VOO tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 508 positions, with the top ten at 37.8%.

XMAR in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +12.2% for the period on Sep 19, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 3.4% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 7.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 14.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 182 days remained on Sep 19, 2026. On Mar 19, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VOO or XMAR?
In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOO returned +16.6% and XMAR returned +11.1%, so VOO returned more.
Which is cheaper, VOO or XMAR?
VOO charges 0.03% a year and XMAR charges 0.85%, so VOO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are VOO and XMAR the same kind of fund?
No. VOO is an index ETF and XMAR is a buffer ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

VOO against XMAR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 19, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, VOO against XMAR, data as of Sep 19, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/voo-vs-xmar Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources