Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

VIG vs XLC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VIG returned +13.9% to XLC's −10.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about VIG and XLC

Net assets: $109.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Div Appreciation ETF, and $22.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+13.9%
VIG total return, 1 year
−10.4%
XLC total return, 1 year
0.04%
VIG expense ratio
0.08%
XLC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VIG costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.3 points; VIG is 4.8 times larger.

VIG vs XLC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVIGXLC
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.9%−10.4%
Drawdown
Below its high13.3%, high on Jan 30, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P U.S. Dividend Growers IndexCommunication Services Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.04%0.08%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$109.1bn$22.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund34.5%75.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, VIG and XLC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first VIG XLC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in VIG
Microsoft Corp 4.90%
Apple Inc 4.88%
Broadcom Inc 4.30%
Eli Lilly & Co 4.10%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.89%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.96%
Johnson & Johnson 2.83%
Visa Inc 2.53%
Only in XLC
META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 21.45%
ALPHABET INC CL A 12.27%
ALPHABET INC CL C 9.82%
WALT DISNEY CO 5.33%
TAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWRE 4.80%
COMCAST CORP CLASS A 4.48%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 4.45%
APPLOVIN CORP CLASS A 4.34%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

VIG Vanguard Div Appreciation ETF XLC State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Dividend growth Tracks an index of Communication services
Total return, 1 year +13.9% −10.4%
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 92.6% 99.8%
Holdings 335 23
Net assets, VIG as of Sep 30, 2026 and XLC as of Oct 27, 2026 $109.1bn $22.1bn

VIG and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

XLC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
VIG

VIG tracks an index of Dividend growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 335 positions, with the top ten at 34.5%.

XLC

XLC tracks an index of Communication services. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −10.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 75.3%. It sat 13.3% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VIG or XLC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VIG returned +13.9% and XLC −10.4%.
Which is cheaper, VIG or XLC?
VIG is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VIG and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 93% of VIG and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, VIG against XLC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vig-vs-xlc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.