Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPYD vs XLC: how they differ

SPYD and XLC hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and SPYD returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPYD and XLC hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPYD and XLC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPYDXLC
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC1.46%5.03%
AT+T INC1.43%5.19%
COMCAST CORP CLASS A1.38%4.61%
OMNICOM GROUP1.29%4.13%
SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS0.36%0.16%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPYDOnly in XLC
HP INC 1.69%META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 18.92%
ACCENTURE PLC CL A 1.64%ALPHABET INC CL A 10.12%
TARGET CORP 1.46%ALPHABET INC CL C 8.10%
MEDTRONIC PLC 1.45%WALT DISNEY CO/THE 4.76%
MOSAIC CO/THE 1.44%WARNER BROS DISCOVERY INC 4.61%
PFIZER INC 1.44%NETFLIX INC 4.57%
CHEVRON CORP 1.43%T MOBILE US INC 4.52%
ARES MANAGEMENT CORP A 1.41%LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT IN 4.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

SPYD and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPYD
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF
XLC
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetState Street
What it isSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High DividendCommunication services
Total return, 1 year+12.9%−2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.6 pts−19.5 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.08%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%100.0%
Holdings8126

SPYD in plain words

SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 14.9%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLC in plain words

XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 26 positions, with the top ten at 70.4%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPYD or XLC?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYD returned +12.9% and XLC returned −2.0%, so SPYD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPYD or XLC?
SPYD charges 0.07% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so SPYD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPYD and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYD and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPYD against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYD against XLC, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spyd-vs-xlc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources