Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

REMX vs SPMO: how they differ

Over the year SPMO returned more, +24.5% against +21.9%, and SPMO charges 0.13% against 0.53%.

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, REMX and SPMO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in REMXOnly in SPMO
Pilbara Minerals Ltd 7.87%Micron Technology Inc 11.01%
Albemarle Corp 7.63%NVIDIA Corp 8.93%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd 6.67%Broadcom Inc 6.24%
Mp Materials Corp 6.65%Johnson & Johnson 4.64%
China Northern Rare Earth Group High-Te 6.58%Alphabet Inc 4.29%
Lianyou Metals Co Ltd 5.83%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.12%
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile Sa 5.64%Alphabet Inc 3.42%
Almonty Industries Inc 5.63%Lam Research Corp 3.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

REMX and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sitsThematic ETFCore index fund
IssuerVanEckInvesco
What it isMiners and metalsS&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year+21.9%+24.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.4 pts+7.0 pts
Expense ratio0.53%0.13%
Already in the S&P 5007.6%100.0%
Holdings30101

REMX in plain words

By weight, 8% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 30 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +21.9% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 4.4 pts. It sits 67.6% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 51.9%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, REMX or SPMO?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, REMX returned +21.9% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, REMX or SPMO?
REMX charges 0.53% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do REMX and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 8% of REMX and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are REMX and SPMO the same kind of fund?
No. REMX is a thematic ETF and SPMO is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

REMX against SPMO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, REMX against SPMO, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/remx-vs-spmo Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources