Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or SGOV?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and SGOV returned +3.8%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MAGS or SGOV?

MAGS charges 0.30% a year and SGOV charges 0.09%, so SGOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MAGS vs SGOV: how they differ

MAGS and SGOV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and SGOV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MAGS	Only in SGOV
TREASURY BILL 65.41%	TREASURY BILL 0.94%
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06%	BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.51%
NVIDIA Corp 4.15%
Apple Inc 4.12%
Amazon.com Inc 4.11%
Tesla Inc 4.07%
Microsoft Corp 3.62%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

MAGS and SGOV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Roundhill	iShares
What it is	Magnificent Seven	0-3 month T-bills
Total return, 1 year	+14.4%	+3.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−3.1 pts	−13.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.09%
Holdings	9	23

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

SGOV in plain words

SGOV is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 0-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or SGOV?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and SGOV returned +3.8%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or SGOV?: MAGS charges 0.30% a year and SGOV charges 0.09%, so SGOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGS against SGOV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against SGOV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-sgov Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources