Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

LQD vs RDVY: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, LQD returned −3.4% to RDVY's +17.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about LQD and RDVY

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $30.6bn for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and $25.4bn for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF.

At a glance
−3.4%
LQD total return, 1 year
+17.6%
RDVY total return, 1 year
0.14%
LQD expense ratio
0.47%
RDVY expense ratio

Pair scorecard

LQD costs 0.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.0 points; LQD is 1.2 times larger.

LQD vs RDVY: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureLQDRDVY
Return
Total return, 1 year−3.4%+17.6%
Drawdown
Below its high6.3%, high on Sep 22, 20215.3%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMarkit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade IndexNasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.14%0.47%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$30.6bn$25.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight94%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund22.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, LQD and RDVY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first LQD RDVY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in LQD
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.20%
CVS HEALTH CORP 0.17%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 0.16%
T-MOBILE USA INC 0.16%
AMAZON.COM INC 0.14%
BOEING CO 0.14%
CITIGROUP INC 0.14%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 0.14%
Only in RDVY
The Travelers Companies, Inc. 2.42%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 2.32%
Visa Inc. (Class A) 2.26%
Microsoft Corporation 2.22%
Accenture plc 2.19%
The Allstate Corporation 2.17%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 2.14%
Expedia Group, Inc. 2.13%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US investment grade bonds Tracks an index of Rising Dividend Achievers
Total return, 1 year −3.4% +17.6%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.2% (IUSB) +13.7% (VOO)
Gap to its benchmark −2.2 pts vs IUSB +3.9 pts vs VOO
Expense ratio 0.14% 0.47%
Holdings 3191 72
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $30.6bn $25.4bn

LQD and RDVY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

LQD and RDVY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
LQD

LQD tracks an index of US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.3% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

RDVY

RDVY tracks an index of Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 72 positions, with the top ten at 22.1%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, LQD or RDVY?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LQD returned −3.4% and RDVY +17.6%.
Which is cheaper, LQD or RDVY?
LQD is cheaper, by 0.33 percentage points a year. That is about $33 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, LQD against RDVY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lqd-vs-rdvy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.