Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IWM vs XLU: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IWM returned +14.1% to XLU's −3.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IWM and XLU

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $75.5bn for iShares Russell 2000 ETF and $23.9bn for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF.

At a glance
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
−3.0%
XLU total return, 1 year
0.19%
IWM expense ratio
0.08%
XLU expense ratio

Pair scorecard

XLU costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.1 points; IWM is 3.2 times larger.

IWM vs XLU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIWMXLU
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.1%−3.0%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 20269.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 IndexUtilities Select Sector Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.19%0.08%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$75.5bn$23.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%58.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IWM and XLU hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IWM XLU
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IWM
JFROG 0.37%
GLAUKOS 0.35%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE 0.35%
MOOG INC CLASS A 0.34%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.33%
UMB FINANCIAL 0.33%
SM ENERGY 0.32%
10X GENOMICS CLASS A 0.31%
Only in XLU
NEXTERA ENERGY INC 12.76%
SOUTHERN CO 7.91%
DUKE ENERGY CORP 7.22%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY 6.33%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER 5.26%
DOMINION ENERGY INC 4.26%
SEMPRA 4.12%
ENTERGY CORP 3.75%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 2000 Tracks an index of Utilities
Total return, 1 year +14.1% −3.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (VTWO) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs VTWO not measured
Expense ratio 0.19% 0.08%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 99.7%
Holdings 1977 32
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $75.5bn $23.9bn

IWM and XLU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWM and XLU flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLU

XLU tracks an index of Utilities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 58.7%. It sat 9.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWM or XLU?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWM returned +14.1% and XLU −3.0%.
Which is cheaper, IWM or XLU?
XLU is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWM and XLU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IWM and 100% of XLU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWM against XLU, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwm-vs-xlu

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.